A Paradise Lost - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
A Paradise Lost - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
A Paradise Lost - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a homogeneous society. Their reports state that OHA was created ‘to further the melting<br />
pot theory.’ These phrases […] come straight out of the imperialist and colonialist<br />
past.” 401 Sovereignty is not only exercised in grassroots activism, nation building,<br />
constitution drafts, and acts of civil disobedience in the form of occupying and cultivating<br />
land, but also in art and literature. 402 For many native Hawaiians, art has always contained<br />
a communal, hence political function. Poetry, protest songs, or dialectic dialogue in the<br />
vein of ancient Greek philosophers are utilized in the struggle for self-determination:<br />
200 years ago, critics told a bunch of radicals to be realistic: ‘How could 13<br />
unorganized colonies break the hold from their mother country which was the<br />
mightiest sea power in the world at the time?’ If that warning was heeded, the<br />
U.S. would not exist today. Nor would Gandhi’s India have its freedom, or little<br />
Vanuatu have been able to kick out both the British and the French in 1980. 403<br />
Practitioners of any art in Hawai’i can hardly escape the political. A hula dancer needs<br />
certain plants for her costume at certain stages of her learning: Already, she may be<br />
involved in the struggle for gathering rights.<br />
401 Ho’oipo DeCambra, “An Interview with Mililani Trask,” in AFSC 1993: 113-24, here 115. Trask<br />
elaborates on the imperialist politics of the U.S.: “America, in 1991, is the only U.N. member state that has<br />
failed to relinquish its trust territories. All of the other countries that had trust territory oversight have freed<br />
their people. […] Hawai’i cannot use the U.N. human rights procedures because America is not a signatory<br />
to these conventions” (122-3).<br />
402 One interesting example of ‘civil disobedience’ is the case of Ka Lae, or South Point: During my 2002<br />
stay in the islands, I briefly met a family that turned part of the Big Island’s South Point area into a museum<br />
and summer school for native Hawaiian students, refuting governmental charges of illegality. For several<br />
years, the U.S. army had entertained plans for a missile range at Ka Lae, evicting residents for the purpose,<br />
and later abandoning the project. To argue their case, the Viernes family has appeared in the public<br />
television program First Friday which is reserved for discussions on indigenous matters. An article by the<br />
late Wayne Westlake highlights the significance of the place: “South Point is the site of original prehistoric<br />
Hawaiian settlements and also served as a sacred migration link connecting Hawaii with the mythical<br />
homeland Kahiki. The ancient heiaus, village sites and canoe moorings testify to these facts. […] According<br />
to the National Park Service, archaeological discoveries at South Point ‘document the longest and most<br />
complete record of human occupation in the Hawaiian Islands.’ South Point is the Plymouth Rock of the<br />
Hawaiian nation, and is a place as spiritual to Native Hawaiians as the Black Hills are to the American<br />
Indians” (Wayne Kaumuali’i Westlake, “South Point,” in Hall 1985: 107-8). Sadly, one approaches this<br />
heralded place seeing abandoned concrete structures and rusting cars. However, the green sands of the bay<br />
and the lovingly self-made museum-cum-information-center both make up for the squalid first impression<br />
(as does the hospitality of the Viernes family).<br />
403 Poka Laenui, “Hawaiian Dialogue,” in AFSC 1993: 125-40, here 127. In the same piece, Laenui also<br />
provides an answer to questions of non-native participation in the movement: “What’s a Hawaiian? Your<br />
question suggests a Hawaiian is defined racially. Perhaps we can take a lesson from the indigenous culture.<br />
People in Hawai’i were predominantly identified by their relationship to the country or to the society or to<br />
the ‘aina. […] If you study Hawaii’s history, you can find where citizenship was not restricted to race. We<br />
had people of many different races as citizens of Hawai’i. The real question was one of national allegiance.<br />
One is either a Hawaiian or another national citizen, not both.” Optimistically, he adds: “Every person who<br />
loves Hawai’i, who grew up here and feels for Hawaii’s future, who wants their children to enjoy Hawai’i as<br />
we have, has an interest in Hawaiian nationhood” (133).<br />
153