09.12.2012 Views

Industrial Biotransformations

Industrial Biotransformations

Industrial Biotransformations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.4 Improvements to Enzymes by Molecular Engineering Techniques<br />

later in 1962, together with Perutz, for their studies on the structures of globular proteins.<br />

Since that time the number of novel protein and peptide structures solved by X-ray diffraction<br />

and, more recently, by NMR spectroscopy has reached 30 800 (May 2005); as a consequence<br />

thereof, our knowledge of enzyme architecture and functionality has been improved considerably.<br />

From 1971 onwards, these biological macromolecular structures have been deposited<br />

in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) at Brookhaven National Laboratories [25]. All deposited structures<br />

are available via the internet (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/).<br />

In addition, methods in the field of recombinant DNA are becoming more and more<br />

“state-of-the-art” technology and widely used in the natural sciences (Table 4.1). In particular,<br />

the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) developed by Mullis (Nobel Prize in 1993) simplifies<br />

the amplification of enzyme coding genes significantly and also the introduction<br />

of site directed mutations [8, 26].<br />

Using the novel techniques of recombinant DNA and the structural knowledge of the<br />

phage T4 lysozyme, in 1988 Matsumura and coworkers published their ground breaking<br />

results on enzyme stabilization by molecular engineering. In site-directed mutagenesis<br />

experiments, two, four or six amino acid residues, spatially close to each other on the<br />

surface of the natural enzyme, were changed into cysteine residues. Consequently, the<br />

variant enzymes contained one, two or three disulfide bonds, hampering the thermal<br />

unfolding of the native enzyme structure. The triple-disulfide variant unfolds at a temperature<br />

23.4 °C higher than the wild-type lysozyme [27–29].<br />

Many examples using the rational design approach to increase enzyme stability (temperature,<br />

pH, organic solvents) or specific activity followed [30]. Successful examples of<br />

rational enzyme design to improve or invert enantioselectivity are relatively rare. However,<br />

Pleiss and coworkers have reported an improvement in the enantioselective hydrolysis<br />

of linalyl acetate by B. subtilis p-nitrobenzyl esterase variants, as predicted by computer<br />

simulations. Furthermore, an inverted enantiopreference using 2-phenyl-3-butin-2yl-acetate<br />

as the model substrate was achieved [31]. Other successful examples of<br />

improved enantioselectivities by rational protein engineering have been presented by the<br />

group working with Hult (Department of Biotechnology, Royal Institute of Technology,<br />

Stockholm, Sweden) on Candida antarctica lipase B (CALB) [32–35] and the group with<br />

Raushel (Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, USA) on phosphotriesterase<br />

from Pseudomonas diminuta [36, 37]. Here at least two variants were created showing a<br />

million-fold difference in enantioselectivity towards the substrate ethyl phenyl p-nitrophenyl<br />

phosphate [37].<br />

Nevertheless, there are still fundamental problems when applying rational enzyme<br />

design: (a) the three-dimensional structure of the enzyme and (b) ideas with respect to<br />

the molecular functions of certain amino acid side chains must be available when<br />

rational design has to be applied. An alternative might be the development of a reliable<br />

structural model based on related enzymes. (c) In general it is not possible to predict<br />

exactly the final structure of a variant enzyme using computer simulations; however, the<br />

methods are continuously improving, and include theoretical methods using combined<br />

quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical calculations (QM/MM) [38]; however, in<br />

all simulations the effect of the enzyme dynamics are neglected. (d) Furthermore, solid<br />

state structures derived from crystallography could be different from protein structures<br />

in solution.<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!