10.12.2012 Views

netLibrary - eBook Summary Structure-based Drug Design by ...

netLibrary - eBook Summary Structure-based Drug Design by ...

netLibrary - eBook Summary Structure-based Drug Design by ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Document<br />

grase and the MuA transposase extends until the carboxyl termini of their respective catalytic domains<br />

with three very similarly positioned and oriented α helices.<br />

Page 98<br />

Limited three-dimensional alignment between the four molecules can be accomplished <strong>by</strong> identifying<br />

structurally homologous stretches along the polypeptide chains if this search is restricted to between the<br />

first well-ordered amino terminal residue and the end of the last β strand. For the core domain of HIV-1<br />

integrase, this corresponds to the region between Ile60 and Gln137. Using the corresponding region in<br />

the MuA transposase, the two structures can be aligned with an rms deviation of 1.7 Å over 69 α-carbon<br />

positions. The main differences between these structures are two insertions in the transposase core: an<br />

11-residue β-stranded extension replacing the turn between the first and the second strand in the HIV-1<br />

integrase core, and a 15-residue extension before helix B with no secondary structure. Both of these<br />

extensions interact with the downstream nonspecific DNA-binding domain of the transposase. For HIV-<br />

1 RNase H, the alignment results in a rms deviation of 2.0 Å over 48 alignable α-carbon positions. The<br />

position of helix A is significantly different in RNase H, as it shifts more than 5 Å toward the β sheet.<br />

There is also an additional 2.5 turn helix following the fourth β strand and a 5-residue loop after this<br />

helix. For RuvC the alignment yields an rms deviation of 2.0 Å over 50 alignable α-carbon positions. In<br />

this case, the differences are mostly the result of longer secondary structure elements in RuvC. Of all the<br />

molecules compared, the HIV-1 integrase core is the smallest, with the most compact design in the<br />

region where these alignments were performed. For comparison, let us mention again that the<br />

homologous ASV integrase core can be aligned with an rms deviation of 1.4 Å over 74 α-carbon<br />

positions in this region.<br />

Both topological similarity and three-dimensional homology with the MuA transposase was expected<br />

<strong>based</strong> on the similarity of the reactions the enzymes catalyze, but the relationship with RNase H and<br />

RuvC was a surprise. This discovery led to the proposal of a new polynucleotidyl transferase<br />

superfamily. All the members of the superfamily are divalent metal ion-dependent endonucleases, and<br />

they all leave 3'-OH and 5'-phosphate groups at the site of cleavage. All the members of the superfamily<br />

display their catalytically essential acidic residues at the same general location. There are three such<br />

residues in HIV-1 integrase, RNase H, and the MuA transposase, while there are four in RuvC. Two of<br />

these residues are always located on the same three-dimensional structural elements, while the location<br />

of the third varies. The Asp64 residue HIV-1 integrase corresponds to Asp443 in HIV-1 RNaseH, Asp7<br />

in RuvC, and Asp269 in the MuA transposase. Based on the three-dimensionally aligned structures, the<br />

α-carbon positions of these residues cluster quite well around that of HIV-1 integrase, with an rms<br />

deviation of 0.84 Å. All these residues are located in the middle of first β strand. The side chain torsion<br />

angle, Chi 1, is<br />

http://legacy.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlReader.dll?bookid=12640&filename=Page_98.html [4/5/2004 4:55:56 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!