10.12.2012 Views

netLibrary - eBook Summary Structure-based Drug Design by ...

netLibrary - eBook Summary Structure-based Drug Design by ...

netLibrary - eBook Summary Structure-based Drug Design by ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Document<br />

Page 355<br />

with the tryptophane residues 38 and 143. The hydroxyl groups of the inhibitor are coordinated to the<br />

Mg 2+ ion. The hydroxyl group in position 1 has an important hydrogen bond to the carboxyl group of<br />

Glu199. The other hydroxyl is near the methyl group donated <strong>by</strong> AdoMet. The pK a of this hydroxyl<br />

group is low (about 3.4) [26]. The 3-nitro group of the inhibitor has favourable van der Waals<br />

interactions with Trp143. The Trp38 residue is located edge-to-face with the catechol plane, which<br />

allows an ideal aromatic hydrophobic contact. Such aromatic hydrophobic interactions have been<br />

described to be important in proteins and for the binding of ligands [44,45]. The binding mode of the<br />

catechol ring of other crystallographically determined potential nitrocatecholtype inhibitors complexed<br />

with COMT is essentially the same as with 3,5- dinitrocatechol (J.Vidgren, unpublished results).<br />

C. Differences in the Active Site of Human, Rat, and Pig COMT<br />

Models for human and pig COMT are easy to build using the experimental structure of the rat COMT,<br />

due to the high degree of homology between the rat, human, and pig COMT enzymes (Figure 4). The<br />

active sites are especially well conserved—the few differences in the active-site residues are collected in<br />

Table 2. The kinetic data show that the K m values of common substrates for rat and human COMT are<br />

very similar. Pig COMT shows, however, a considerably higher K m value for catechol [46]. The same<br />

difference is apparent for inhibitors represented <strong>by</strong> the K i values in Table 1.<br />

The model for the binding of vinylphenylketone to pig and rat COMT is shown in Figure 13. Assuming<br />

that the catechol part of the inhibitor adopts the same position as found in the crystal structure with<br />

dinitrocatechol, the vinylphenylketone substituent has enough room to bind to both enzymes. The most<br />

significant difference between these enzymes lies in residue 38, the hydrophobic tryptophan in rat (and<br />

human) COMT and the polar arginine in pig COMT. If Arg38 is directed towards the hydrophobic core<br />

of the enzyme in a similar conformation as Trp38 (shown in Figure 13), it causes repulsion with the<br />

catechol ring of the inhibitor. However, it is probable that the polar Arg38 is directed towards the<br />

solvent. In this case the substrates and inhibitors will lack the favorable contacts that exist with Trp38 in<br />

human and rat enzymes. Obvi-<br />

Table 2 Differences in the Active Sites Between Rat, Human, and Pig COMT<br />

Position Rat Human Pig<br />

38 Trp Trp Arg<br />

173 Val Cys Cys<br />

201 Met Arg Ser<br />

http://legacy.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlReader.dll?bookid=12640&filename=Page_355.html [4/5/2004 5:28:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!