10.12.2012 Views

netLibrary - eBook Summary Structure-based Drug Design by ...

netLibrary - eBook Summary Structure-based Drug Design by ...

netLibrary - eBook Summary Structure-based Drug Design by ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Document<br />

This method was used to screen a significant portion of the contents of the Cambridge Structural<br />

Database [45] against the ALR2 holoenzyme binding site (D.K. Wilson, J. M. Petrash, and F. A.<br />

Quiocho, unpublished data). Among the approximately 30 highest scoring compounds were several<br />

aromatic aldoximes that had inhibition constants in the micromolar range. These were similar to<br />

aldoximes such as benzaldoxime, which has been previously observed to have similar inhibition<br />

constants [46].<br />

Page 242<br />

A disappointing result was that this search did not “rediscover” any of the known high-affinity ALR2<br />

inhibitors that were contained in the search library. Before the determination of the ternary complex of<br />

the enzyme with zopolrestat, this was interpreted as meaning that these compounds bound to the enzyme<br />

in a conformation somewhat different than the one adopted in the crystal structure used for the search.<br />

The structure of the ternary complex showed this to be a wrong assumption; it was the protein that<br />

changed conformation upon inhibitor binding, creating a pocket that did not exist in the holoenzyme<br />

structure. When bound to the protein, zopolrestat is actually quite similar in conformation to its small<br />

molecule x-ray structure. It is therefore very possible that different ALR2 inhibitors and substrates may<br />

cause the enzyme to flex in different ways, creating binding sites that may be different in size and<br />

chemical nature.<br />

B. Computational Thermodynamic Perturbation<br />

Computational thermodynamic perturbation is a powerful, albeit computationally expensive, group of<br />

techniques that are designed to estimate relative binding affinities of two closely related drugs, given the<br />

structure of at least one of them complexed with the target protein [44]. This approach has the potential<br />

to assay candidate compounds in the computer for improvements in inhibitor binding, there<strong>by</strong> removing<br />

the necessity to sythesize and assay these compounds in the lab.<br />

For a number of reasons, ALR2 promises to be a good system for the application of this technique and<br />

the experimental verification of the results. The structure is very well determined in complex with<br />

zopolrestat, a high-affinity inhibitor. A number of zopolrestat derivatives with various functional groups<br />

decorating the compound have been sythesized and partially characterized with respect to ALR2<br />

inhibition [13,47]. These compounds could serve as a sort of basis set of controls for the theoretical<br />

calculations. If parameters used in these calculations can be selected such that the computationally<br />

derived binding energies agree even qualitatively with the experimentally determined binding energies,<br />

serious consideration should be given to new compounds that are predicted to bind with enhanced<br />

affinity. Since ALR2 is crystallizable with zopolrestat bound, there is every reason to believe that<br />

crystals of the enzyme complexed with similar compounds will be obtainable. Such structures could<br />

provide the basis for further rounds of drug improvement.<br />

http://legacy.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlReader.dll?bookid=12640&filename=Page_242.html [4/5/2004 5:09:26 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!