25.12.2012 Views

Willard Van Orman Quine

Willard Van Orman Quine

Willard Van Orman Quine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

236 daniel isaacson<br />

Five weeks after presenting “Two Dogmas” at the Toronto meeting,<br />

<strong>Quine</strong> gave a paper to Carnap’s seminar at the University of<br />

Chicago 24 (part of which he published under the title “On Carnap’s<br />

Views on Ontology”). In it, he again addresses his disagreements with<br />

Carnap:<br />

[A]n issue has persisted between us for years over questions of ontology and<br />

analyticity. These questions prove to be interrelated; their interrelations<br />

come out especially clearly in Carnap’s paper “Empiricism, semantics, and<br />

ontology.” I shall devote particular attention to that one paper in an effort<br />

to isolate and reduce our divergences. (OCVO 203)<br />

In “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology,” Carnap had accepted<br />

<strong>Quine</strong>’s notion that ontological commitment is carried by the variables<br />

of a given theory, but he did this in the context of a distinction<br />

between internal and external questions, which <strong>Quine</strong> rejected on<br />

the basis of his rejection of the analytic-synthetic distinction.<br />

In 1952 Carnap published a short paper, “Meaning Postulates,” in<br />

response to <strong>Quine</strong>’s attack on his reliance on the notion of analytic<br />

truth. Also in 1952 he wrote a note replying to <strong>Quine</strong>’s attack on his<br />

use of the notion of analyticity, which he left unpublished (Creath<br />

1990, 427–32; see also p. x for Creath’s remarks on this note). At this<br />

time a forum for a significant public reply to <strong>Quine</strong> on these issues<br />

was promised by Paul Arthur Schilpp’s invitation to Carnap to be the<br />

subject of a Library of Living Philosophers volume. Schilpp issued invitations<br />

to contributors during 1953. <strong>Quine</strong> completed his contribution,<br />

“Carnap and Logical Truth,” in time to meet Schilpp’s deadline,<br />

in the spring of 1954. The volume was not published for another nine<br />

years. In 1956 <strong>Quine</strong> published a Carnap-free half of the essay under<br />

the title “Logical Truth,” and in 1957 he published the whole<br />

of it in Italian translation in Rivista de Filosofia. The entire essay<br />

appeared in English in 1959 in an issue of Synthese honoring Carnap,<br />

and finally, in 1963, it appeared in the Schilpp volume, with Carnap’s<br />

reply.<br />

This was the first publication of Carnap’s main reply to <strong>Quine</strong>’s<br />

sustained critical discussion of his views in “Carnap and Logical<br />

Truth,” though Carnap had already published a paper, “Meaning and<br />

Synonymy in Natural Languages” (1955), consisting of material that<br />

had outgrown his reply to <strong>Quine</strong> for the Schilpp volume (see Creath<br />

1990, 37). Also during this period Carnap made one more attempt<br />

Cambridge Companions Online © Cambridge University Press, 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!