25.12.2012 Views

Willard Van Orman Quine

Willard Van Orman Quine

Willard Van Orman Quine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Quine</strong> and Logical Positivism 263<br />

(Carnap 1942, 247). For a good account of the continuity between Carnap’s<br />

move to semantics and his earlier espousal of syntax, see Sarkar<br />

1992, 220–3.<br />

30. But see Orenstein 2002, 107–14, for cogent exposition and defence of<br />

<strong>Quine</strong>’s rejection of the claim that logic and mathematics are true by<br />

convention and thus analytic.<br />

31. Peter Strawson attributes this declaration to <strong>Quine</strong> in Strawson 1982<br />

(p. 12) and Strawson 1990 (p. 310), on both occasions without reference.<br />

Robert Cummins also attributes this declaration to <strong>Quine</strong> and uses it<br />

as the epigraph of his book Meaning and Mental Representation (1990),<br />

also without reference. I have been unable to locate this sentence in<br />

any of <strong>Quine</strong>’s publications, nor have a number of <strong>Quine</strong> experts I consulted.<br />

However, Strawson’s (1990) paper is published with a comment<br />

by <strong>Quine</strong> (CS), and we may suppose that <strong>Quine</strong> would there have demurred<br />

from this imputation to him had he found it alien.<br />

32. “The lore of our fathers is a fabric of sentences....Itisapale grey lore,<br />

black with fact and white with convention. But I have found no substantial<br />

reasons for concluding that there are any quite black threads in<br />

it, or any white ones” (CLT 406).<br />

33. In “Two Dogmas in Retrospect,” <strong>Quine</strong> remarks of this passage that it<br />

“had unforeseen consequences. I suspect it is responsible for my being<br />

widely classified as a pragmatist. I don’t object, except that I am not clear<br />

on what it takes to qualify as a pragmatist. I was merely taking the word<br />

from Carnap and handing it back: in whatever sense the framework for<br />

science is pragmatic, so is the rest of science” (TDR 272).<br />

34. Cf. Gibson 1982, 174.<br />

35. I plan to do this in another paper.<br />

references<br />

Abbagnano, Nicola. 1967. Positivism. Translated by Nino Langiuli. In The<br />

encyclopedia of philosophy, edited by Paul Edwards. Vol. 6. New York:<br />

Macmillan; The Free Press.<br />

Anschutz, R. P. 1953. The philosophy of J. S. Mill. Oxford: Oxford University<br />

Press.<br />

Ayer,A.J.1936. Language, truth and logic. London: Victor Gollancz; New<br />

York: Oxford University Press. Rev. ed., 1946.<br />

ed. 1959. Logical positivism. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.<br />

Ayer, A. J., in dialogue with Brian Magee. 1978. Logical positivism and its<br />

legacy. In Men of ideas: Some creators of contemporary philosophy.<br />

London: British Broadcasting Corp.<br />

Ayers, Michael. 1991. Locke. Vol. 1, Epistemology. London: Routledge.<br />

Cambridge Companions Online © Cambridge University Press, 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!