25.12.2012 Views

Willard Van Orman Quine

Willard Van Orman Quine

Willard Van Orman Quine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Selected Bibliography 305<br />

Føllesdal, D. 1973. Indeterminacy of translation and under-determination of<br />

the theory of nature. Dialectica 27:289–301.<br />

Frankfurt, H. 1960. Meaning, truth and pragmatism. Philosophical Quarterly<br />

10:171–6.<br />

Friedman, M. 1975. Physicalism and the indeterminacy of translation. Nous<br />

9:353–74.<br />

Geach, P. 1951. On what there is. Part 1. Aristotelian Society 25 (suppl.):<br />

125–36.<br />

1953. <strong>Quine</strong> on classes and properties. Philosophical Review 62:409–12.<br />

George, A. 1986. Whence and whither the debate between <strong>Quine</strong> and Chomsky.<br />

Journal of Philosophy 83:489–99.<br />

Gibson, R. 1980. Are there really two <strong>Quine</strong>s? Erkenntnis 15:349–70.<br />

1992. The key to interpreting <strong>Quine</strong>. Southern Journal of Philosophy<br />

30:17–30.<br />

1994. <strong>Quine</strong> and Davidson: Two naturalized epistemologists. Inquiry<br />

37:449–63.<br />

1996. <strong>Quine</strong>, Wittgenstein and holism. In Wittgenstein and <strong>Quine</strong>, edited<br />

by R. Arrington and H-J. Glock. London and New York: Routledge.<br />

Goodman, N. 1961. Condensation versus simplification. Theoria 27:47–8.<br />

Grandy, R. 1969. On what there need not be. Journal of Philosophy 66:<br />

807–12.<br />

1973. Reference, meaning and belief. Journal of Philosophy 70:439–52.<br />

Grice, H., and P. Strawson. 1956. In defence of a dogma. Philosophical Review<br />

65:141–58.<br />

Haack, S. 1977. Analyticity and logical truth in Roots of Reference. Theoria<br />

43:129–43.<br />

Hacking, I. 1981. Was there ever radical mistranslation? Analysis 41:171–<br />

5.<br />

Harding, S. 1975. Making sense of observation sentences. Ratio 17:<br />

65–71.<br />

Harman, G. 1967. <strong>Quine</strong> on meaning and epistemology. Parts 1 and 2. Review<br />

of Metaphyisics 21:124–51, 343–67.<br />

1994. Comment on Michael Dummett. Synthese 27:401–4.<br />

1996. Analyticity regained. Nous 30:392–400.<br />

Hintikka, J. 1997. Three dogmas of <strong>Quine</strong>’s empiricism. Revue Internationale<br />

de Philosophhy 51:457–77.<br />

Hookway, C. 1994. Naturalized epistemology and existence valuation. Inquiry<br />

37:465–85.<br />

Horwich, P. 1992. Chomsky versus <strong>Quine</strong> on the analytic-synthetic distinction.<br />

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92:95–108.<br />

Humphries, B. 1970. Indeterminacy of translation and theory. Journal of<br />

Philosophy 67:167–78.<br />

Cambridge Companions Online © Cambridge University Press, 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!