hiver - Historical Revisionism by Vrij Historisch Onderzoek

——————————————————————> Conseils de révisions / hiver winter 2007
Western society, the Holocult. Whereas questioning and reviling religious beliefs is almost a
cornerstone underpinning the mindset of those societies, even genuine historical research into the
subject of a subsection of the 60 million who died in the second world war is prohibited and most
certainly leads to being ostracised in public: The suffering of the Jews may not be questioned since "if
it were to be proven that "The Holocaust" has, in fact, been stage-managed for political reasons in
order to promote Israeli interests, then the State of Israel and the United States as public players, and
the global Zionist organizations as private lobbying entities would have to accept their share of
responsibility for the damage, suffering and hardship they have wrought upon the Middle East and the
world and, accordingly, they should be held accountable."
The latter is a quote from communiqué no. 16 of Argentina's growing opposition movement
MSRA or Argentine Second Republic Movement, who intend to host a Holocaust conference of
their own in order to examine how the Holocaust has been used propagandistically for
political ends following the end of World War II. [SEE OUR SPANISH SECTION].Rather
than a one-off event, the Tehran conference is the beginning of the unravelling of the special status
that Israel and Zionist Jews enjoy in the world justified by their special suffering at the hands of the
Germans. The issue is not whether Jews suffered during World War II but that this suffering has been
exploited since, in what Finkelstein called the "Holocaust industry". For the last half century, only
Jews and retired politicians, the latter in their memoirs, were permitted to voice criticism of Israel and
the Zionist lobby. Meanwhile, with some historical distance, many more people are demanding to have
a say in the matter, although others, like the Muslim American Society (MAS) Freedom Foundation
feel the need to curry favour by stating "True Muslims must never deny the Holocaust" and in the
words of Ibrahim Ramey, the Director of their Human and Civil Rights Division: "The evidence of this
crime, and the horrible magnitude of this killing, is irrefutable. From sources as varied as Nazi war
records, film documentation, and most importantly, the testimony of survivors and witnesses, we
know that the mass murder of European Jews was, indeed, the single greatest crime of genocide in the
twentieth century." - whereas the communiqué from Argentina questions why, if World War II cost
more than 60 million lives in Europe and Asia, mankind's attention is almost solely focused on the
suffering of 10% of those victims and millions have been added since then "including almost 2 million
Iraqis killed by the Bush Family and their Associates since the First Gulf War in 1991 to date".
Recognising that the label of unique suffering can no longer be worn unchallenged, researchers
who questioned certain aspects of the official holocaust story were convicted in political show trials as
a warning to others: in France Robert Faurisson or Roger Garaudy, the latter for his substantive book
The Founding Myths of Modern Israel, in Austria David Irving, in Australia Fredrick Toeben, in
Germany Germar Rudolf and Ernst Zundel. But with Iran state-sponsoring a conference on the subject
and inviting eminent Rabbis to attend, all this effort has come to naught. The topic will not go away
and awkward questions are going to be asked.
As a gentile European I may not ask these questions without penalty, but Rabbi Moishe Arye
Friedman, chief Rabbi of the Orthodox anti-Zionist Jewish Community in Vienna, Austria, did not
prostrate before the God of Zion and did not hesitate to attend the Tehran conference decried by the
Muslim American Society as immoral and motivated by racial hatred. In his address to the conference
he stated that the founder of the Zionism, Theodor Herzl, already spoke in his first diaries of a number
of six million Jews who were allegedly threatened in Europe and that, according to Herzl, the so-called
Jewish state would only have a chance if there was a disaster for these six million European Jews, as
well as that the Bolshevists and the British government already used the six million figure in their war
propaganda against Germany during the first world war. He further talked about the collaboration
between the Nazis and the Zionists, and added that he was sure that the last word about the real or
actual number of the victims had not yet been spoken, mentioning that in 1990 the number originally
specified of four million victims of Auschwitz had been reduced to approximately 900,000 to 1.1
million whilst the six million figure remained unchallenged.
Now to be consistent, Austrian prosecutors would have to charge the Vienna Chief Rabbi with
Holocaust denial, but such a trial would further dent the credibility of the laws protecting the official
version of events as well as that of the Shoah story itself, repeatedly embellished by Hollywood
productions. It is, therefore, highly unlikely, that the Rabbi will be dragged before a court to answer on
charges of anti-Semitism.
Meanwhile there are two strands to the unofficial debate about the holocaust: on the one hand
historians demand that this episode of history must not be barred from proper scientific scrutiny in
order to separate myth from reality. Guiseppe Furioso, for example, asks why there is no documentary
evidence of the gassings nor any mention of it in Churchill's memoirs or by any other political figures
of the time.
The other, and more potent, strand is the questioning of the Pax Americana or victor's justice
established with the Nuremberg Trials and the propagandistic exploitation of Jewish suffering for
— 79 —