06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ehavior. The design also provided means for compar<strong>in</strong>g such behavior on logged<br />

and unlogged forest land.<br />

Except for a one-time measurement of soil particle-size distribution, all<br />

soil and vegetal characteristics were measured on all plots each year. Bulk<br />

densities of the 0-1 <strong>in</strong>ch and 1-2 <strong>in</strong>ch depths of the soil mantle were determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

from rep1 icated vol ume-weight soi 1 cores taken at random locations with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

plots. Total pore space was determ<strong>in</strong>ed from tension-table measurements on the<br />

soil bulk density cores. Soil particle size distribution was determ<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />

one-third of the composited bulk soil samples taken from the 0-1 <strong>in</strong>ch and 1-2<br />

<strong>in</strong>ch depths of the soil mantle at random locations with<strong>in</strong> each plot. Water-<br />

stable aggregate distribution was determ<strong>in</strong>ed from another one-third of the<br />

cornposited bulk soil samples, and soil organic matter content was determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

from the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g one-third. Vegetal characteristics, consist<strong>in</strong>g of live<br />

plant cover density, 1 i t ter cover density, logg<strong>in</strong>g debris cover density, rock<br />

cover density, ash cover density, depth of chips, and size of bare soil<br />

open<strong>in</strong>gs were measured with a po<strong>in</strong>t analyzer on 100 po<strong>in</strong>ts established on<br />

transects with<strong>in</strong> each plot.<br />

A ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulator was used to apply water to each jnfiltrometer plot at<br />

a constant rate of 3.26 <strong>in</strong>ches per hour for 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes. Runoff from trough<br />

ra<strong>in</strong> gages was collected at 5-m<strong>in</strong>ute <strong>in</strong>tervals to provide a record of ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />

amounts and <strong>in</strong>tensities. Plot runoff, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g both water and eroded soil,<br />

was caught at 5-m<strong>in</strong>ute <strong>in</strong>tervals and recorded. This discharge was reta<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />

part of the total runoff and eroded material from each plot.<br />

LOGGING AND RESIDUE TREATMENT EFFECTS<br />

Both the logg<strong>in</strong>g and residue disposal treatments significantly <strong>in</strong>fluenced<br />

soil and vegetative characteristics and altered surface runoff and erosion<br />

behavior.<br />

BULK DENSITY<br />

Effects on Soil Properties<br />

The effects of residue treatments on bulk density of the surface 2-<strong>in</strong>ches<br />

of soil are shown <strong>in</strong> figure 1. The highest bulk density <strong>in</strong> 1973 occurred on<br />

the blocks where chips were spread over the surface. These higher bulk den-<br />

sities were caused by compaction from tractors used to spread the chips.<br />

The next highest bulk densities occurred between w<strong>in</strong>drows on blocks where<br />

the logg<strong>in</strong>g residue was dozer piled and burned. These bulk densities also are<br />

re1 ated to tractor compaction.<br />

Four years later, <strong>in</strong> 1977, the highest bulk densities were between w<strong>in</strong>drows<br />

on blocks where the logg<strong>in</strong>g residue was dozer piled and burned. The lowest<br />

bulk densities were found on control plots <strong>in</strong> unlogged areas adjacent to the<br />

cl earcut tracts.<br />

In general, between 1973 and 1977, soil bulk densities improved on the blocks<br />

where chips were respread and also on the blocks where chips were picked up and<br />

removed. In contrast, soil bulk densities on sites from which residue had been<br />

removed by dozer pi 1 i ng fai 1 ed to recover or improve.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!