06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pileated Woodpeckers on the CEF nested only <strong>in</strong> western larch and only <strong>in</strong> stands<br />

with an old-growth component of larch and Douglas-fir. One nest was on the edge of<br />

the lower shelterwood unit. Common Flicker, Mounta<strong>in</strong> and Black-capped Chickadee and<br />

Red-breasted Nuthatch nests were found <strong>in</strong> stubs left <strong>in</strong> cutt<strong>in</strong>g units. Yellow-<br />

bellied Sapsuckers occasionally nested <strong>in</strong> paper birch left <strong>in</strong> she1 terwood units or<br />

even <strong>in</strong> clearcuts.<br />

The cutt<strong>in</strong>g units <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> this study were relatively small; the effects on<br />

overall nest<strong>in</strong>g populations appeared to be m<strong>in</strong>or because of an abundance of old-<br />

growth forest left between and adjacent to the cutt<strong>in</strong>g units. Shelterwood units <strong>in</strong>i-<br />

tially cont<strong>in</strong>ued to provide both nest<strong>in</strong>g and feed<strong>in</strong>g sites for many birds, but when<br />

the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g large trees are removed (10-20 years after the first cutt<strong>in</strong>g) such<br />

units will lose their usefulness to species that need a denser canopy or large trees.<br />

In cutt<strong>in</strong>g units where few snags and stubs were left, the availability of<br />

hole-nest sites probably was a limit<strong>in</strong>g factor for some hole nesters. In uncut<br />

western larch/Douglas-fir forests, food rather than nest sites is probably the<br />

1 imit<strong>in</strong>g factor for woodpeckers. On any unit where timber harvest<strong>in</strong>g tends to el im-<br />

<strong>in</strong>ate western larch larger than 20 <strong>in</strong> (51 cm) dbh, and other snags and cull s, the<br />

impact on cavity nesters will be strongly negative.<br />

Feed<strong>in</strong>g Activities<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g 1977 and 1978, control units and logged units (3 and 4 years after har-<br />

vest<strong>in</strong>g) on the CEF were observed for a total of 569 hours, a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 60 hours <strong>in</strong><br />

each unit. The follow<strong>in</strong>g woodpecker species were observed feed<strong>in</strong>g: Pi1 eated , Hairy,<br />

Downy, and Northern Three-toed Woodpeckers, Common Flicker, and Yellow-bellied and<br />

Nil 1 iamson's Sapsuckers. In general, feed<strong>in</strong>g activity was greater <strong>in</strong> the lower units<br />

than <strong>in</strong> the higher units and greater <strong>in</strong> the control (uncut) units than <strong>in</strong> the har-<br />

vested units (table 6). The absence of paper birch <strong>in</strong> the higher units may account<br />

<strong>in</strong> part for the reduced feed<strong>in</strong>g on those sites. Yellow-bellied Sapsuckers feed<br />

heavily on birch sap dur<strong>in</strong>g the summer months. Overall feed<strong>in</strong>g activity was slightly<br />

1 ess <strong>in</strong> the summer of 1978 (1.9%) than <strong>in</strong> the summer of 1977 (1.6%). Conner and<br />

Crawford (1974) found a much higher percentage of activity <strong>in</strong> Appalachian clearcuts.<br />

They recorded woodpecker feed<strong>in</strong>g time of 55%, 43%, and 9% o f sampl<strong>in</strong>g time <strong>in</strong> clear-<br />

cuts 1-year old, 5-years old, and 12-years old respectively. However, they also<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded activities such as preen<strong>in</strong>g and courtship.<br />

TABLE 6. Percent of sampl<strong>in</strong>q time that woodpeckers were observed feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> lower<br />

and higher treatment units.<br />

Harvest<strong>in</strong>g Treatment<br />

Group Sel ection All units<br />

Treatment elevation Control Uncut Islands Cut She1 terwood Cl earcut Comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

Lower 4300 ft (131 1 m) 6.9 2.7 0.1 5.9 0.1 3.5<br />

Higher 5030 ft (1534 m) 4.4 2.6 -0- 1.3 -0- 1.4<br />

Both 5.g1 2.7 0.1 3.7 0.1 2.5<br />

'Not the mean between lower and higher units because of unequal total observa-<br />

tion times,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!