06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It is logical that if surface temperatures are different for clearcut and uncut<br />

areas then soil temperatures are also different. Data from Solo Creek <strong>in</strong> July<br />

(fig. 11 ) show soils under the clearcut to be warmer at depths to 20 <strong>in</strong>ches (50 cm).<br />

Data from Coram shows cl earcut temperatures <strong>in</strong> midsummer to be 6OC-3OC higher from<br />

1-10 <strong>in</strong>ches <strong>in</strong> depth than those of the uncut stand. Studies at Newman Ridge<br />

(Shearer personal communication) have shown differences of 8OC at 10 <strong>in</strong>ches below<br />

clearcut and uncut areas. Increases <strong>in</strong> net radiation and consequently heat flux at<br />

the surface of clearcuts produce <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> air temperature. Mean air temperature<br />

at Coram <strong>in</strong> midsummer at standard height <strong>in</strong>creased 4OC follow<strong>in</strong>g clearcutt<strong>in</strong>g. Other<br />

study results show <strong>in</strong>creased air temperatures close to the surface*<br />

07.<br />

BCD<br />

UNCUT CllT<br />

Mean a<br />

!b' / Mean max.<br />

10 15 20 25 30 35 40<br />

TEMPERATURE (OC)<br />

Figure 11. -- Mean maxim and mean temperature profiles by depth for<br />

July 1978 on uncut and cZearcu;S sites at So20 Cmak. O2 is -the humus<br />

Zayer and BCD is brown crwnbly decayed wood.<br />

Residue treatments and seedbed preparation treatments such as burn<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

scarify<strong>in</strong>g have an additional affect on temperature regimes. The placement, color<br />

and thermal properties of surface materials help determ<strong>in</strong>e surface temperatures.<br />

Highly reflective and conductive materials have much cooler surfaces than absorbant<br />

materials with low conductivity (Cochran 1969; Fowler 1974; Lowry 1969). Common<br />

forest materials l ike litter, soil, logs, chips, charcoal, rocks, etc. , have con-<br />

siderably different properties (tab1 e 3).<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g equation ill ustrates the relationship between surface properties<br />

and surface temperature:<br />

where AT is the change <strong>in</strong> temperature, AG is the change <strong>in</strong> heat flux, k is the thermal<br />

conductivity and cp is the heat capacity.<br />

Surface temperatures at two sites (Lubrecht and Coram) were very similar <strong>in</strong> both<br />

broadcast bugned and cleared areas. Maximum temperatures on both treatments ranged<br />

from 50 C-60 C, and m<strong>in</strong>imum temperatures were also nearly the same for both treat-<br />

ments. Temperatures at 9,200 feet (2 800 m) <strong>in</strong> Wyom<strong>in</strong>g followed the same pattern.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!