06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Si 1 v<br />

Former<br />

culture and Residue Treatments Affect<br />

Water Used By A LarchlFir Forest<br />

Howard C. Newman<br />

Consul ti ng Hydrologist;<br />

y Research Associate, School of Forestry<br />

University of Montana, Missoula<br />

and<br />

Wyman C. Schmidt<br />

Project Leader and Research Silvicul turist<br />

USDA-Fores t Service<br />

Intermounta<strong>in</strong> Forest and Range Experiment Station<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Three silvicultural systems--clearcut, shelterwood, and group<br />

sel ecti on--were coup1 ed with four residues treatments, rang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from <strong>in</strong>tensive to conventional uti 1 i zation and broadcast<br />

burn<strong>in</strong>g, to evaluate the environmental effects of harvest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1 arch/Douglas-fir forests <strong>in</strong> Montana. Effects of the 12<br />

treatment comb<strong>in</strong>ations on accumulated precipitation, water used<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the grow<strong>in</strong>g season, and soil water status dur<strong>in</strong>g the year,<br />

were evaluated for the first 4 years after harvest<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />

study was conducted on a steep east aspect at about 4,500 feet<br />

(1 370 m) elevation.<br />

Si 1 vicul tural treatments <strong>in</strong>creased the amount of precipitation<br />

that reached the forest floor, most <strong>in</strong> clearcuts and group<br />

selections and 1 ess <strong>in</strong> shel terwoods . Snow accumulation<br />

which accounted for about 50 percent of the annual precipi-<br />

tation, <strong>in</strong>creased about 80 percent <strong>in</strong> clearcuts, 50 percent<br />

<strong>in</strong> group selections, and 40 percent <strong>in</strong> shelterwoods when<br />

compared to uncut mature forest. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the grow<strong>in</strong>g season,<br />

the uncut mature forest used about 75 percent of the total<br />

annual precipitation. Differences <strong>in</strong> water use follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

harvest<strong>in</strong>g were less than expected. Shelterwoods used about<br />

4 percent, group selections 10 percent, and clearcuts 11<br />

percent less than the uncut control. Rapid revegetation on<br />

a1 1 harvested areas, the residual stand <strong>in</strong> the shel terwoods ,<br />

and soil water deficits <strong>in</strong> the uncut forest apparently<br />

ameliorated some differences between uncut forest and treated<br />

areas. As a function of differences <strong>in</strong> accumulated precipitation,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!