06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RAIN<br />

The major precipitation <strong>in</strong>strumentation consisted of five permanently located<br />

ti ppi ng bucket recordi ng rai n gauges and eight scattered Paci fi c rai n cans. Ti ppi ng<br />

buckets were located at fully <strong>in</strong>strumented weather stations (fig. 1) <strong>in</strong> a lower<br />

uncut-control and group-selection unit, and <strong>in</strong> an upper clearcut and shelterwood<br />

unit. Their charts were checked daily and collected weekly.<br />

Tipp<strong>in</strong>g bucket gauges provided the bulk of the precipitation data used <strong>in</strong><br />

this study. Daily, monthly, and annual summaries were prepared by si lvicul tural<br />

treatment for comparative analysis. Ra<strong>in</strong> can data served as a back-up to the<br />

mechanical record<strong>in</strong>g devices , provided supplementary preci pi tati on data for the<br />

unmoni tored silvicul tural and control treatments, and aided <strong>in</strong> the evaluation of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual storms. Pacific ra<strong>in</strong> cans were set out seasonally <strong>in</strong> conjunction with<br />

the permanent stations and at eight other semi-permanent locations surround<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

study site. Each was checked weekly or after every major storm. A s<strong>in</strong>gle snow gauge<br />

was used year round to record both ra<strong>in</strong> and snow <strong>in</strong> a clearcut adjacent to study<br />

site.<br />

SNOW<br />

Twenty-six snow courses (fig. 1) were established with<strong>in</strong> a1 1 si lvicul tural<br />

treatments and control areas to measure snow accumulation and me1 t, redistribution,<br />

elevational effects, and variability among and between silvicul tural treatments,<br />

residue treatments, and control areas. Fol low<strong>in</strong>g logg<strong>in</strong>g snow course sample po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

were randomly selected, permanently marked, and remeasured.<br />

Samples were taken monthly dur<strong>in</strong>g accumulation and weekly dur<strong>in</strong>g me1 t with a<br />

standard Federal snow sampler directly downhi 11 from each snow course sample po<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

Both depth and water equivalent were recorded to the nearest 0.5 <strong>in</strong>ch (1.3 cm).<br />

Condition of soil and duff under the snowpack were noted. Supplementary snow samples<br />

to evaluate residue treatments was performed about the first of April <strong>in</strong> 1977 and<br />

1978 <strong>in</strong> the two clearcuts and shelterwoods by tak<strong>in</strong>g 30 samples with<strong>in</strong> each residue<br />

treatment.<br />

Eight snowmel t lysimeters (Haupt 1969) were <strong>in</strong>stal led to more precisely rnoni tor<br />

silvicultural effects on snowmelt rates. Lysimeters were located with<strong>in</strong> an upper and<br />

lower control area and each of the six silvicul tural treatments at the same aspect<br />

and elevation <strong>in</strong> order to m<strong>in</strong>imize treatment and cl imatic <strong>in</strong>fluences. The lysimeters<br />

were attended almost daily through the snow accumulation period and once or twice a<br />

day dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tense me1 t periods.<br />

Snow-water equivalent (<strong>in</strong>ches) from the snow courses and lysimeters was used to<br />

calculate annual precipitation with<strong>in</strong> the treatment areas and to estimate areal snow-<br />

water equivalent for si lvi cul tural and residue treatments.<br />

Soil Water<br />

Before logg<strong>in</strong>g, 10 permanent po<strong>in</strong>ts were systematically located at 100-foot<br />

(30.5-m) <strong>in</strong>tervals with<strong>in</strong> each of the four residues treatments <strong>in</strong> each of the<br />

clearcut and shelterwood cutt<strong>in</strong>gs and the control areas. Five po<strong>in</strong>ts were located<br />

with<strong>in</strong> each of the eight group-selection cuts (small clearcuts) at various <strong>in</strong>tervals<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the cutt<strong>in</strong>g, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the size of open<strong>in</strong>g.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!