06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The eruption of Mount Sa<strong>in</strong>t Helens has raised fears of w<strong>in</strong>dthrown residues<br />

predispos<strong>in</strong>g forests to <strong>in</strong>sects. High w<strong>in</strong>ds accompany<strong>in</strong>g the 18 May 1980 eruption<br />

blew down mill ions of board feet of Douglas-fir timber grow<strong>in</strong>g on the mounta<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Foresters are now worried that the downed residues may become <strong>in</strong>fested with the<br />

Douglas-fir beetle, which may then spread to stand<strong>in</strong>g healthy trees farther from the<br />

mounta<strong>in</strong>. Frank Kopecky, deputy regional forester <strong>in</strong> Portland, Oregon, says that<br />

the beetles could become "a major problem" <strong>in</strong> two or three years (Missoulian 1980).<br />

RESIDUES CREATED BY OTHER AGENTS<br />

Lightn<strong>in</strong>g may predispose trees and forest stands to <strong>in</strong>sect attack when the<br />

struck trees do not ignite and burn. In the northern Rockies, Schmitz and Taylor<br />

(1 969) document an <strong>in</strong>stance where a 79-foot-tall , 24-<strong>in</strong>ch-diameter (24 m, 0.6m) tree<br />

struck by lightn<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>in</strong>fested along its entire length by bark beetles--the upper<br />

two-thirds by the p<strong>in</strong>e engraver beetle, the mounta<strong>in</strong> pfne beetle at near mid-bole,<br />

and the western p<strong>in</strong>e beetle and a p<strong>in</strong>e engraver <strong>in</strong> the lower bole. Moreover, 76 per-<br />

cent o-F the immature trees with<strong>in</strong> 80 feet (24.3 m) of the struck tree were attacked<br />

and became <strong>in</strong>fested with p<strong>in</strong>e engraver beetles (fig. 9). Schmitz and Taylor (1969)<br />

speculated that the <strong>in</strong>fested trees surround<strong>in</strong>g the lightn<strong>in</strong>g-struck tree suffered<br />

lightn<strong>in</strong> damage to their roots, predispos<strong>in</strong>g them to p<strong>in</strong>e engraver beetle attack.<br />

Schmi tz 9 personal communication) be1 ieves that a 1 ightn<strong>in</strong>g-struck tree is probably<br />

the most attractive of what we call "weakened" trees.<br />

Figure 9. --Lightn<strong>in</strong>g, Cn addition +o<br />

ignit<strong>in</strong>g fires predispos<strong>in</strong>g forests<br />

to <strong>in</strong>sects, often predisposes struck<br />

trees (when not ignited) and those<br />

surround<strong>in</strong>g them to various species<br />

of bark and engraver beetles. In<br />

the op<strong>in</strong>ion of Dr. R. P. Sch&tz<br />

(persona2 comnicationl , Zightn<strong>in</strong>gstruck<br />

trees are probab2y the most<br />

att~active to some <strong>in</strong>sect species of<br />

those trees we caZZ "weakened", by<br />

one cmse or anoeher.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!