06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Consider<strong>in</strong>g the planned and unplanned modifications to the study plan, our study<br />

design was based around four comb<strong>in</strong>ations of harvest<strong>in</strong>g and residue treatments and a<br />

control, as fol 1 ows :<br />

Si 1 vicul tural<br />

Treatment Prescription Block # Residue Treatment Subunit<br />

1 Cl earcut 2 3 Residues burned 1<br />

2 Cl earcut 23 Residues mechanically removed 3<br />

3 She1 terwood 21 Residues burned 1<br />

4 She1 terwood 21 Residues mechanical l y removed 3<br />

5 Undisturbed forest 24 None 5<br />

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g Design and Plot Layout<br />

To facilitate the pre- and post- harvest sampl<strong>in</strong>g activities of all the <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

discipl<strong>in</strong>es and studies, a permanent plot location system was established on each of<br />

the cutt<strong>in</strong>g blocks. Permanent po<strong>in</strong>ts were systematically located at 30.5 meter<br />

(100 ft) Interyals with<strong>in</strong> each of the subunits <strong>in</strong> the clearcut and shelterwood blocks<br />

and at variable <strong>in</strong>tervals with<strong>in</strong> each of the eight group selection cuts, Twenty<br />

potnts were also established <strong>in</strong> each control area, Blocks 14 and 24.<br />

For our entomological work, we randomly selected from the permanent plot location<br />

system three plots <strong>in</strong> each of the four treatments. The plots were randomly selected<br />

with the exception that <strong>in</strong> treatments 1 and 3, if the plot <strong>in</strong>itially selected was<br />

missed by the prescribed fire, the random selection procedure cont<strong>in</strong>ued until a plot<br />

was selected that had, <strong>in</strong> fact, been burned.<br />

Fi el d and Laboratory Procedures<br />

Sampl <strong>in</strong>g began at the study area <strong>in</strong> September 1975 and cont<strong>in</strong>ued through August<br />

of 1977. At each sampl<strong>in</strong>g period, one sample was taken from each of the plots, for a<br />

total of 15 samples over the 5 treatments. The sampl <strong>in</strong>g dates were as follows:<br />

1975 1 September<br />

1976 4 June<br />

20 June<br />

2 July"<br />

21 ~ u l y ~<br />

4 August<br />

19 August<br />

6 September<br />

14 September<br />

1977 19 July<br />

29 August<br />

'No samples were drawn <strong>in</strong> she1 terwood treatments 3 and 4 <strong>in</strong> July.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!