06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the undisturbed forests. Some research shows that the distance between treated<br />

areas and the undisturbed stand as well as the size of the area treated are both<br />

significant <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpretation of treatment effects on forest floor arthropods<br />

(Newmann 1971). Others <strong>in</strong>dicate that forests surround<strong>in</strong>g treated areas are important<br />

<strong>in</strong> retard<strong>in</strong>g colonization by species of spiders from open habitats, which have to<br />

overcome the barrier as aeronauts, while species of semi-open habitats, occurr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sporadically <strong>in</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>g forest stands, have the advantage that they can <strong>in</strong>vade<br />

the area by land (Huhta 1971). A third <strong>in</strong>vestigator concluded that spiders move<br />

freely between burned prarie areas and unburned patches, and vice versa, s<strong>in</strong>ce they<br />

collected more <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> transects near the periphery of burned areas than <strong>in</strong><br />

transects located toward the center (Riechert and Reeder 1972).<br />

The <strong>in</strong>direct <strong>in</strong>fluence of chang<strong>in</strong>g the microcl imate depends on the condition of<br />

the stand prior to treatment. The removal of a1 1 or part of either a dense <strong>coniferous</strong><br />

stand or of the subsequent residues where the forest floor is heavily shaded will<br />

have more strik<strong>in</strong>g effects than the manipulation of a more open-grown stand, where<br />

more light reaches the forest floor and where understory vegetation may be more<br />

abundant. These harvest<strong>in</strong>g and residue practices, particularly clearcutt<strong>in</strong>g, disrupts<br />

both diurnal and seasonal fluctuations of many physical factors, pr<strong>in</strong>cipally tempera-<br />

ture, moisture, light <strong>in</strong>tensity, w<strong>in</strong>d, and humidity. Some animal groups, unable to<br />

tolerate the new microcl imate, are at a disadvantage and disappear. Other groups,<br />

perhaps by their abi 1 i ty to reproduce rapid1 y, can survive the environmental change<br />

and may even benefit as a result of treatment.<br />

In another paper <strong>in</strong> this proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, Hungerford (1980) discusses the micrp-<br />

environmental response to harvest<strong>in</strong>g and residue management. He <strong>in</strong>dicates that<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g harvest<strong>in</strong>g, on several sites surface conditiws such as radiation load and<br />

temperature have reached lethal levels. In other cases harvest<strong>in</strong>g has aggravated<br />

and created frost pockets. Both temperature extremes, and radiation load and other<br />

factors must certa<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>fluence forest floor arthropods.<br />

At this time we are only able to discuss some general management implicati~ns<br />

of the effects of harvest<strong>in</strong>g and residue management on forest floor fauna, based on<br />

our own research and <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g related research of others. The full management<br />

implications of these forest <strong>in</strong>sect studies will only be completely realized when<br />

results have been completely <strong>in</strong>tegrated with the results of closely-related studies<br />

<strong>in</strong> other discipl<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g biological technicians--Drew Depuydt, Paul Hengel, and Mrs. Deborah<br />

Olienyk Mar<strong>in</strong>o--made important contributions to thTs study beyond the expectations<br />

of their assignments. Drew Depuydt supervised much of the field work, nearly all of<br />

the laboratory process<strong>in</strong>g, as well as the identification and curat<strong>in</strong>g of all specimens<br />

collected. Paul Hengel prepared the graphics far the figures, and Deborqh Mar<strong>in</strong>o<br />

reviewed, abstracted, and contributed to the <strong>in</strong>terpretations of previous research<br />

cited or discussed <strong>in</strong> this paper.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!