06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

p<strong>in</strong>e beetle problem <strong>in</strong> the northern Rockies to catastrophic (stand replacement)<br />

fires of nearly a century ago. They (the fires) triggered the growth of large<br />

stands of lodgepole which are now about the same age over vast areas of western<br />

Montana, northern Idaho and <strong>in</strong> Yellowstone National Park (Kugl <strong>in</strong> 1980). At this<br />

time, an appreciable percentage of logdepole p<strong>in</strong>e stands, near and east of the<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>ental Divide <strong>in</strong> Montana, conta<strong>in</strong> from two to several age classes, ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

because of the mounta<strong>in</strong> p<strong>in</strong>e beet1 e/fi re history and severe conditions that excl uded<br />

other species (D. Cole 1978) (fig. 15).<br />

In many areas where natural fires have been suppressed, forest residues result<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from mounta<strong>in</strong> p<strong>in</strong>e beetle epidemics accumulate until hot fires occur. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

D. Cole (1978), "such fires are normally more destructive than ones that would have<br />

otherwise occurred if fires had not been suppressed, and they tend to perpetuate<br />

future extremes <strong>in</strong> the mounta<strong>in</strong> p<strong>in</strong>e beetle/lodgepol e p<strong>in</strong>e/fir <strong>in</strong>teractions."<br />

Several op<strong>in</strong>ions have been expressed that the bark beetle epidemics now rampant <strong>in</strong><br />

the Rockies and Intermounta<strong>in</strong> West may be a product of fire exclusion (Schwennesen<br />

1979). In Glacier National Park, the mounta<strong>in</strong> p<strong>in</strong>e beetle epidemic took such a<br />

strong hold because fire suppression programs were so successful and trees that<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>arily might have burned are now mature and ripe for the beetles (Kugl i n 1980).<br />

Figure 15.--Along the Cont<strong>in</strong>entaZ Divide <strong>in</strong> Montana, an appre&abZe<br />

percentage of pure ZodgepoZe p<strong>in</strong>e stands contaGa f~om too to severaZ<br />

age ctasses, ma<strong>in</strong>Zy because of the rnoun-ta<strong>in</strong> p<strong>in</strong>e beetZe-fire hiskory<br />

and severe site conditions ID. Cole 1978).<br />

Western spruce budworm <strong>in</strong>festations <strong>in</strong> the northern Rockies are <strong>in</strong>fluenced not<br />

only by the <strong>in</strong>teraction of forest residues, fire and succession, but also by the<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction of the budworm and the mounta<strong>in</strong> p<strong>in</strong>e beetle. One recommendation for<br />

ameliorat<strong>in</strong>g the impact of the western spruce budworm is to return the more xeric<br />

Douglas-fir sites to p<strong>in</strong>e (.Williams and others 1971 ). However, <strong>in</strong> many young<br />

ponderosa p<strong>in</strong>e stands, the mounta<strong>in</strong> p<strong>in</strong>e beetle not only kills many desirable crop<br />

trees and creates understock<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the stand, but also appears to be convert<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

stands from ponderosa p<strong>in</strong>e to Douglas-fir (McGregor 1973). This succession could<br />

predispose such stands to be more susceptible to the western spruce budworm. The<br />

same successional situation can be created by silvicultura1 practices that harvest<br />

p<strong>in</strong>e and favor Douglas-fir or the true firs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!