06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> figure 11 and appendix E, the relative amounts of water used by<br />

the different treatments rema<strong>in</strong>ed about the same dur<strong>in</strong>g the second, third, and<br />

fourth year after the harvest<strong>in</strong>g was completed. However, the magnitude of the<br />

differences decl i ned dur<strong>in</strong>g that period. In the second year (1976) after harvest<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

the clearcuts used 18 percent less water than the controls, the group selections 14<br />

percent less, and the shelterwoods 8 percent less. By the fourth year (1978), these<br />

differences had decl<strong>in</strong>ed to 9, 11, and 1 percent, respectively. of course, dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that same period, understory vegetation had begun its rapid recovery and was demand<br />

substantial amounts of water (Schmidt 1980).<br />

Accumulative water use curves for the different si 1 vicul tural treatments para1<br />

leled each other early <strong>in</strong> the row<strong>in</strong>g season, but became <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly divergent as<br />

the season progressed (fig. 12 7 . Very little difference <strong>in</strong> accumulative use was<br />

apparent between the three silvicul tural treatments until late July, but the uncut<br />

mature forest areas diverged early <strong>in</strong> the grow<strong>in</strong>g season. Concurrent with water use<br />

divergence was the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of significant water use from the lower end of the soil<br />

profiles. Heavy frequent ra<strong>in</strong>s are common <strong>in</strong> June, but July and August are normally<br />

hot and dry <strong>in</strong> this area.<br />

WATER USE BY S ILV ICULTURAL TREATMENT - 1976<br />

Figure 12.--AccmZative water use dur<strong>in</strong>g the grow<strong>in</strong>g season on areas<br />

differ<strong>in</strong>g silvicuZtura2 treatments, 2 years after hmest<strong>in</strong>g was compZeted.<br />

The differences shown between the treatments and the controls (uncut mature<br />

forest) are conservative, Actual differences under regular management would probably<br />

be greater for several reasons. A limited amount of preharvest water use data <strong>in</strong>di-<br />

cated that preharvest water use differences existed on some of the sites. For example,<br />

the uncut mature forest on the area later harvested for a shelterwood, was us<strong>in</strong>g more<br />

water than its correspond<strong>in</strong>g control. The soils on the control of one of the repli-<br />

cates were shallower and consequently a smaller total water reservoir was available

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!