06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The stems were divided at 4 mm (0.16 <strong>in</strong>ch) to provide some estimate of potential<br />

browse on the area; observations of big-game feed<strong>in</strong>g on the study area had <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />

nearly all brows<strong>in</strong>g was on stems less than 4 mm (0.16 <strong>in</strong>ch). Elk (~ervus canadensis)<br />

and deer (0docoiZeus sp. ) were the primary ungulates found <strong>in</strong> the study area.<br />

To determ<strong>in</strong>e biomass of small shrubs and trees less than 0.5 m (1.6 feet) tall,<br />

and all herbaceous vegetation, vegetation on two 0.5 X 0.5-m (1.6 X 1.6-foot) quadrats<br />

adjacent to each permanent set of quadrats was clipped, dried, and weighed.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The results presented here highlight major effects or trends found <strong>in</strong> these<br />

prelim<strong>in</strong>ary data. Evaluations of the vegetative response to silvicultural and residues<br />

management treatments wi 11 be emphasized, focus<strong>in</strong>g on (1) shrub response, (2) cover,<br />

and (3) biomass. Further analyses of these data <strong>in</strong> subsequent publications will aim at<br />

(1) ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong>formation, (2) identify<strong>in</strong>g significant vegetation trends and their<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions between silvicul tural and residues uti 1 i zation treatments, and (3) evaluat-<br />

i ng <strong>in</strong>dividual species responses. Ultimately, long-term vegetation responses wi 11 be<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed from periodic remeasurements.<br />

Vegetation responses usually relate closely to plant species status prior to<br />

treatment. Because of this, we measured vegetation <strong>in</strong> the undisturbed forest immedi -<br />

ately before treatments were imposed, and found that shrub volume averaged 31 100 m3/ha<br />

( 16,468 yards3/acre) <strong>in</strong> the mature forest prior to harvest--equivalent <strong>in</strong> biomass to<br />

4 687 kg/ha (4,180 poundslacre). Shrub biomass was comprised of 4 063 kg/ha (3,624<br />

pounds/acre) of large stems, 348 kg/ha (310 pounds/acre) of small stems, and 276 kglha<br />

(246 poundslacre) of 1 eaves. Lesser vegetation, which <strong>in</strong>cluded herbs and small shrubs<br />

less than 0.5 m (1.6 feet) tall , accounted for 57 percent of the surface cover, with<br />

1 i tter and woody material account<strong>in</strong>g for most of the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g cover. The equivalent<br />

biomass of this 57-percent "liv<strong>in</strong>g" cover averaged 1 184 kg/ha (1,056 pounds/acre).<br />

Thus, total 1 ive biomass of understory vegetation (not <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g understory trees) <strong>in</strong><br />

the mature forest was 5 871 kg/ha (5,237 poundslacre). This <strong>in</strong>dicates a relatively<br />

lush understory flora, about a third more than found on nearby larch/fir forests where<br />

spruce and subalp<strong>in</strong>e fir were more <strong>in</strong> evidence (Stickney [In press]), and substantially<br />

above the 280 kg/ha (250 pounds/acre) biomass measured on a cold, high-el evation lodge-<br />

pole p<strong>in</strong>e site <strong>in</strong> Wyom<strong>in</strong>g (Schmidt and Lotan 1980).<br />

As shown <strong>in</strong> Appendix I, 11 tree species, 21 major shrub species, and 58 herbaceous<br />

species were found on the study area.<br />

SILVICULTURE TREATMENT EFFECTS<br />

Response of Major Shrubs<br />

A1 1 harvest-cutti ng systems--she1 terwood, group selection, and cl earcut--reduced<br />

average shrub volume to less than 25 percent of preharvest levels and as low as 10<br />

percent on the group-selection cutt<strong>in</strong>gs (fig. 5). These are average values that <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

a1 1 residues treatments with<strong>in</strong> each silviculture treatment. Because plots were measured<br />

2 years after harvest<strong>in</strong>g, they likely show somewhat more volume than was present immedi-<br />

ately after logg<strong>in</strong>g. We have no data with which to verify that assumption, but<br />

Stickney's (In press) data <strong>in</strong>dicates this is generally true.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!