06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SUMMARY<br />

The results presented <strong>in</strong> this paper briefly summarize the major effects of silvi-<br />

culture and residues treatments on understory vegetation <strong>in</strong> a 1 arch/Dougl'as-fi r forest.<br />

Subsequent reports will analyze complex species trends and <strong>in</strong>teractions to illustrate<br />

some of the more basic aspects of the study. A1 though the data reported here cover<br />

only the first 4 years after harvest<strong>in</strong>g, some immediate treatment effects and trends<br />

are apparent.<br />

All of the harvest cutt<strong>in</strong>gs drastically reduced total shrub volume and<br />

biomass, but 4 years after harvesti ng a1 1 treatments had regai ned one-fourth<br />

or more of their shrub volume and one-third to two-thirds of their preharvest<br />

biomass. Clearcuts recouped their logg<strong>in</strong>g-caused shrub losses most effec-<br />

tively. She1 terwood cutt<strong>in</strong>gs reduced shrub volume somewhat less than did the<br />

clearcuts and group selections, but the recovery of shrubs was slower on the<br />

shel terwood sites .<br />

Residues treatments affected shrubs more than si 1 vi cul ture treatments for the<br />

first 4 years. The understory-protected treatment stood out as be<strong>in</strong>g dramat-<br />

ical ly different than the other three residues treatments. It resulted <strong>in</strong> a<br />

much smaller loss of major shrubs dur<strong>in</strong>g logg<strong>in</strong>g, and its 4-year recovery of<br />

both shrub volume and biomass far exceeded that of the other three treatments<br />

This effect was particularly apparent <strong>in</strong> the shel terwood cutt<strong>in</strong>gs where the<br />

residual stand of trees afforded some protection of the understory dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1 oggi ng .<br />

Burni ng , coup1 ed wi th e4 ther i ntermedi ate- or conventional -wood-resi dues-<br />

util ization standards, consistently reduced major shrub vegetation more than<br />

ei ther the understory-protected or a1 1 -residues-removed treatments. However,<br />

even on the burned areas, shrubs recovered substantially with<strong>in</strong> 4 years after<br />

harvest<strong>in</strong>g .<br />

The relative importance of different shrub species <strong>in</strong> terms of volume and<br />

biomass varied substantially--some positively, some negatively, some show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1 i t tle change--i n response to the different comb<strong>in</strong>ations of si 1 vi cul ture-<br />

residue treatments.<br />

Lesser vegetation, comprised of herbs and small shrubs, responded rapidly and<br />

differentially to the various comb<strong>in</strong>ations of treatments. Before harvest<strong>in</strong>g ,<br />

herbs and small shrubs provided cover on 57 percent of the soil surface <strong>in</strong><br />

the mature forest, and litter and woody material accounted for most of the<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>der. Four years after treatment, cover on a1 1 treatments averaged 67<br />

percent. Most of this <strong>in</strong>crease was <strong>in</strong> herbaceous material . Remov<strong>in</strong>g a1 1 the<br />

residues on the group selections <strong>in</strong>creased herbaceous cover the most. At the<br />

other end of the scale, herbaceous cover decreased slightly on the shelter-<br />

woods where the understory trees and shrubs had been protected dur<strong>in</strong>g harvest-<br />

i ng,<br />

Of the total live understory biomass (not <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g trees) <strong>in</strong> the uncut<br />

mature forest, major shrubs accounted for 80 percent, and herbs and small<br />

shrubs the rema<strong>in</strong>der of the understory vegetation. Four years after treat-<br />

ments, an average of all treatment comb<strong>in</strong>ation.responses shows that herbs and<br />

small shrubs now account for over half the total biomass. Collectively,<br />

shrubs and herbs returned to 56 percent of their preharvest biomass at 2<br />

years and 75 percent at 4 years, but a far larger proportion was now <strong>in</strong> the<br />

lesser shrubs and herbaceous material.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!