06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

METHODS<br />

Barger (1980) describes the various aspects of the sites and treatments used <strong>in</strong><br />

this study. The basic silvicultural prescriptions <strong>in</strong>cluded group selection, shelter-<br />

wood and clearcutt<strong>in</strong>g. At one site partial cutt<strong>in</strong>gs remov<strong>in</strong>g both the overstory and<br />

the understory were used. On all sites we used an uncut portion of the stand as a<br />

control ,<br />

Residue and seedbed preparation treatments were superimposed on the cutt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

units. Intensive util ization standards and conventional util ization standards left<br />

differ<strong>in</strong>g amounts of di fferent-s ized residues on the sites. Both treatments were<br />

broadcast burned at one site (fig. 1A). At two other sites residues were left<br />

unburned (fig. 10). One treatment on all areas studied had a1 1 residues and advanced<br />

regeneration removed to 1 <strong>in</strong>ch <strong>in</strong> diameter, leav<strong>in</strong>g only low understory vegetation<br />

(fig. 1~). At one site residues were chipped and spread back on the site (fig. ID).<br />

The four study sites represented a variety of habitat and timber types, with climatic<br />

conditions vary<strong>in</strong>g from warmldry to coldlwet and elevations as high as 9,500 feet<br />

(2 900 m).<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g are brief descriptions of each site:<br />

Coram Ex~erimental Forest is near West Glacier, Mont. Habitat types<br />

are varibus phases of the Abies lasiocarpa ~l<strong>in</strong>tonia uniflora type (~fister<br />

and others 1977) on elevat~ons d<br />

from 4, 0 f-m-0 ft<br />

(1 585 m). ~11. treatment areas had an east fac<strong>in</strong>g aspect on 40-60 percent<br />

slopes.<br />

Lubrecht Experimental Forest is on the Blackfoot River approximately 35<br />

miles northeast of Missoula, Mont. The habitat type is basically<br />

Pseudotsuga menziesii/Vacc<strong>in</strong>ium caes itosuy on gently roll<strong>in</strong>g terra<strong>in</strong> at<br />

4,000 ft (1 20 0 m) elevqtion wit Ti- west to northwest aspects.<br />

Solo-Hemlock area is <strong>in</strong> extreme eastern Wash<strong>in</strong>gton near Priest Lake,<br />

Idaho. Habitat type is Tsu a hetero h lla pachistima rn rs<strong>in</strong>ities at an<br />

elevation of 4,000 ft (1 -Lent 2<br />

areas h<br />

a a nort aspect<br />

with 10-20 percent slopes. The stand was virg<strong>in</strong> timber 300-400 years old.<br />

Wyom<strong>in</strong>g Site is <strong>in</strong> the Union Pass area of the Bridger-Teton National<br />

Forest, 40 miles southwest of Dubois, Wyo. Habitat type is - Abies lasiocarpa/<br />

Vacc<strong>in</strong>ium sco arium. The stand is lodgepole p<strong>in</strong>e at elevations rang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

- O h 0 m) to 9,500 ft (2 900 m), with an east fac<strong>in</strong>g aspect<br />

on slopes from 0-20 percent.<br />

Our objectives were to monitor the operational factors to determ<strong>in</strong>e their<br />

response to the selected harvest<strong>in</strong>g and residue treatments, We chose to evaluate the<br />

microsites at or near the ground surface and not attempt to monitor conditions<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the forest canopy. Many of the specific microsites monitored were selected<br />

because of other studies on regeneration, microbiology, entomology, etc. We also<br />

chose to base our measurements on data that would allow us to evaluate the energy<br />

budget components described by Geiger (1 950). Interrelationships between various<br />

energy flow components can be represented by the follow<strong>in</strong>g balance equation (Gates<br />

1968; Lowry 1958), called the energy budget equation:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!