06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION<br />

Vegetation <strong>in</strong>tegrates the effects of biological and physical <strong>in</strong>trusions <strong>in</strong>to an<br />

ecosystem and provides the best <strong>in</strong>dicator of response to various treatments that man<br />

and/or nature impose on the system. Vegetation also provides both direct and <strong>in</strong>direct<br />

benefits to man <strong>in</strong> a variety of resources rang<strong>in</strong>g from timber products, to forage and<br />

cover for wildlife, water regulation, protection of the soil mantle, and esthetics,<br />

This is particularly apparent <strong>in</strong> the extensive 1 arch/Dougl as-fir (~arix occidentaZis/<br />

Pseudotsuga mensCesiC) forests of the Northern Rockies where no s<strong>in</strong>gle resource predom<strong>in</strong>ates<br />

(Schmidt and others 1976).<br />

Natural succession i n Northern Rocky Mounta<strong>in</strong> forests slowly but <strong>in</strong>exorably drives<br />

vegetation toward a greater complement of shade-to1 erant species. This is particularly<br />

strik<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> larch/fir forests because of the wide range <strong>in</strong> species and shade-tolerance<br />

levels. Vegetation classification schemes capitalize on these to1 erance differences ,<br />

and classifications based on climax stages of the vegetation have been developed<br />

(Daubenmi r e and Daubenmi r e 1968; Pf i s ter and others 1977). Under the cl imax concept,<br />

nature has had sufficient time to <strong>in</strong>tegrate time and space variation <strong>in</strong> vegetation<br />

development.<br />

Natural <strong>in</strong>trusions of fire, <strong>in</strong>sects, disease, w<strong>in</strong>d, and other factors disrupt<br />

succession and can either set vegetation back to year one, have little effect, or<br />

greatly accelerate succession toward more shade-tolerant forest vegetation. However,<br />

man's activities <strong>in</strong> the forest, particularly harvest cutt<strong>in</strong>gs, now create most physical ,<br />

biological , and esthetic change. Even-aged si 1 vi cul tural sys terns--cl earcutti ng , seed<br />

tree, and she1 terwood--coupled with site preparations that expose m<strong>in</strong>eral soi 1 and<br />

reduce vegetative competi ti on, have proved most successful <strong>in</strong> regenerati ng larch/<br />

Doug1 as-fi r forests (Schmidt and Shearer 1973). However, chang<strong>in</strong>g management objec-<br />

tives and wood-uti 1 i zation standards have made i t necessary to reevaluate some of these<br />

silvicultural systems <strong>in</strong> terms of environmental effects. As utilization of woody<br />

residues <strong>in</strong>tensifies, the number of mi crosi tes provided by materi a1 formerly 1 e ft <strong>in</strong><br />

the woods decreases, the amount of fuel for prescribed burn<strong>in</strong>g decreases, and the<br />

amount and form of nutrients may be changed. Some of these changes may positively<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence one resource and negatively <strong>in</strong>fluence others. There is no s<strong>in</strong>gle comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

of harvest cutt<strong>in</strong>g, uti 1 i zation level , and subsequent cultural practice that wi 11 meet<br />

all forest management objectives. Comb<strong>in</strong>ations of these practices are dictated by<br />

economics, pub1 i c needs, protection of the basic soi 1 resource, biological and physical<br />

practicability, forest type, landform, and a host of other factors.<br />

One resource need<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased ernphasi s i n forest management is understory vegeta-<br />

tion. It serves both actively and passively to <strong>in</strong>crease wildlife and esthetics values,<br />

and to protect basic soil resources. However, understory vegetation can a1 so serve as<br />

competi ti on for tree seed1 i ngs, often del ayi ng tree regeneration for decades (Schmidt<br />

and Shearer 1973). This paper presents prel imi nary results demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g the effects<br />

of three different si lvicul tural practices comb<strong>in</strong>ed with four different residue uti li-<br />

zation treatments on understory vegetation <strong>in</strong> a larch/Dougl as-fir forest <strong>in</strong> Montana.<br />

Four years of understory vegetation-response data are presented.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!