06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the study, certa<strong>in</strong> phenomena <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g nutrient depletion and soil deteri-<br />

oration which I had studied over the past 12 years began to jell <strong>in</strong>to a series of<br />

hypotheses. The first <strong>in</strong>volved "direct nutrient cycl<strong>in</strong>g" or the transfer of nutrients<br />

<strong>in</strong> the tropics on extremely poor soils from dead organic matter via mycorrhizal fungi<br />

almost completely bypass<strong>in</strong>g the soil (Stark 1969). This hypothesis has s<strong>in</strong>ce been<br />

tested for the tropics (Herrera et a1 . l978), but is of 1 i ttl e importance to the<br />

Rocky Mounta<strong>in</strong>s s<strong>in</strong>ce on young soils nutrients appear to be transferred largely <strong>in</strong>di-<br />

rectly or from the dead organic litter to the soil solution, and thence to roots or<br />

mycorrhizae. The importance of direct nutrient cycl<strong>in</strong>g here is that it led to the<br />

second hypothesis.<br />

The second one <strong>in</strong>volved the concept of the "Biological Life of a Soil," This<br />

term refers to the length of time on the geologic time scale over which a soil is<br />

chemical ly able to support merchantable trees, regardless of cl imate. This concept<br />

acknowledges that a soil can wear out, and that excessive harvest or too frequent<br />

fires can accelerate the rate of "wear<strong>in</strong>g out." The logical question for a nutrient<br />

cycl<strong>in</strong>g ecologist now work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> western Montana was, "Can these fire treatments be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

applied on these soils cause an acceleration of the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the long-term produc-<br />

tive capabilities of the soil?" The data be<strong>in</strong>g collected on the loss of nutrients<br />

below the root zone <strong>in</strong> the soil water on 20 treatments and 5 controls, and precipiia-<br />

tion as well as a host of other related measurements were ideal for answer<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

question (steel@ 1975). About the same time, a third idea appeared <strong>in</strong> the author's<br />

m<strong>in</strong>d, that of "nutrient shock," Nutrient shock is the temporary deficiency of one or<br />

more biologically essential nutrients <strong>in</strong> available form <strong>in</strong> the soil. The biological<br />

1 ife theory deals with a permanent loss of available and unavailable (total) nutri-<br />

ents. Nutrient shock is the condition which could occur on nutrient-poor<br />

young, th<strong>in</strong>, or poorly developed soils which had had the vegetation destroyed by too<br />

frequent or <strong>in</strong>tense fires, or by logg<strong>in</strong>g. This was a phenomenon which could occur on<br />

the relatively young soils of the Rocky Mounta<strong>in</strong>s, It has been observed by the author<br />

<strong>in</strong> Nevada (unpublished) .<br />

The results of the study are summarized <strong>in</strong> fig. 1, Fires were classified by<br />

surface soil temperatures as light (300° C or >572' F). No significant nutrient losses occurred with<br />

fires less than 180" C, nor with those rang<strong>in</strong>g from 180-300" C. The nutrient losses<br />

which did occur were largely replaced by precipitation <strong>in</strong> 1-2 years time. Those fires<br />

greater than 300" C and particularly those greater than 500" C (932" F) caused accel-<br />

erated nutrient losses below the root zone for 2-5 years. In all of the hot fires the<br />

only two elements lost <strong>in</strong> excess of what was be<strong>in</strong>g returned annually <strong>in</strong> precipitation<br />

were Ca and Mg. Nitrogen was also lost <strong>in</strong> solution and <strong>in</strong> smoke, but nutrient losses<br />

<strong>in</strong> smoke were not quantified <strong>in</strong> this early study. Nutrient losses below the root zone<br />

<strong>in</strong> the unburned control soils were 20.8 meq/m2 of surface area, compared to<br />

21.2 meq/m2 for precipitation <strong>in</strong>put. Control nutrient loss just equalled the annual<br />

return of calcium from precipitation, Magnesium showed a slight deficit on control<br />

plots (more rout<strong>in</strong>ely lost then added).<br />

By apply<strong>in</strong>g the reason<strong>in</strong>g of the Biological Life of the Soil, we were able to<br />

measure the total nutrient content over a meter square (3 ft3) of surface area to the<br />

depth of the root zone (50 cm, 19.7 <strong>in</strong>ches). This constitutes the "work<strong>in</strong>g capital"<br />

<strong>in</strong> the bank, plus <strong>in</strong>terest (annual additions from weather<strong>in</strong>g). We were also able to<br />

measure how much added nutrient loss occurred for the hottest fires (over the level of<br />

loss by the controls). This was money expended from the bank account for 2-5 years<br />

after each fire over every 50-year fire rotation. A 50-year fire frequency was<br />

selected <strong>in</strong> the absence of natural or man-controlled fire frequencies for the sake of<br />

calculation, Precipitation <strong>in</strong>puts cancel 1 ed out control 1 osses.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!