06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I Newly formed, small-dimension residues (1 eaves, twigs, and small branches up to<br />

2 to 3 cm <strong>in</strong> diameter) are relatively high <strong>in</strong> available carbon, nitrogen, and<br />

macroel ement nutrients. Initial colonization of these materials at the Lubrecht<br />

site was by Athelia epiphylla Pers. (figs. 11 and 12), while at Coram the prevalent<br />

fungi were ( i n order of frequency) Athelia epiphylla, Leucogyrophana pseudomollusca<br />

arm.) Parm., and corticium lepidum Rom. Primary colonization occurred under<br />

psychrophilic conditions (fig. 11). Leaves were more frequently colonized than<br />

small woody materials, The impact of these fungi on small dimension materials may<br />

be expressed directly by changes <strong>in</strong> nutrient content of needles (table 5) and <strong>in</strong>-<br />

directly by observations on amounts of fungal biomass produced.<br />

Table 5.--Apparent effect of the association of Athelia epiphylla on<br />

nutrient losses of over-w<strong>in</strong>tered need1 es of subal p<strong>in</strong>e fir,<br />

Abies lasiocarpa (Hook. ) Nutt, , Coram Experimental Forest,<br />

Montana, May, 1975.<br />

- . - . . -<br />

A. epi ph y ll am C a Mg K P Ash C N C/N<br />

Present* 17,200 71 0 1,9.75 0.086 6.6 34.7 1.18 29:l<br />

Absent 14,500 1,090 5,750 .14 6.1 44.88 1.18 38:1<br />

Si gni ficance ns** ns p=0.001 p=0.001 n s n s ns p=0.01<br />

*Values corrected for weight loss of affected foliage.<br />

**Not significant.<br />

DISCUSS ION AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

We have attempted to characterize one part of the organic resource of Rocky<br />

Mounta<strong>in</strong> forests <strong>in</strong> some detail. The characteristics and amounts of wood <strong>in</strong> the<br />

soil are significant (Jurgensen and others 1980; Harvey and others 1980) <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

their effects on soil quality and function. It is apparent from exist<strong>in</strong>g (or<br />

formerly exist<strong>in</strong>g) forest ecosystems that ecosystem perturbation, where biomass is<br />

removed either by fire or <strong>in</strong>discrim<strong>in</strong>ate harvest<strong>in</strong>g practices, may be directly<br />

reflected <strong>in</strong> the organic resources of the site, whether they be parent materials or<br />

end products.<br />

Brown-cubical decayed wood on a1 1 <strong>in</strong>vestigated sites is <strong>in</strong>terchangeably functional<br />

with himus, but the functional importance <strong>in</strong>creases with the dryness of the<br />

site. Reasonable guidel<strong>in</strong>es for biomass utilization can be established us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

biomass productivity estimates, estimates of decay rates, and assessments of optimal<br />

volumes of necessary soi lwood (Harvey and others 1980) . These guide1 <strong>in</strong>es, however,<br />

only address one form of residue, i .e. those large enough (0.2 to 0.5 meters) to<br />

emerge as recognitabl e and persistent brown-rotted wood <strong>in</strong> soil . Significant impacts,<br />

at present lack<strong>in</strong>g adequate assessment, could occur by harvest<strong>in</strong>g or premature<br />

burn<strong>in</strong>g small-dimensional materials, Deleterious effects on site nutrient resources<br />

would be observed because the nutrient capital <strong>in</strong> small-dimension materials is<br />

1 arge.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!