06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

if the forest floor is completely consumed (Campbell 1961 ), and "fuel reduction<br />

fires" of low <strong>in</strong>tensity substantially reduce populations of forest floor fauna (Leo-<br />

nard 1977). In African soils, burn<strong>in</strong>g destroys populations of termites and results<br />

<strong>in</strong> impoverishment of these tropical soils (Reichert and Reeder 1972).<br />

Although most groups of macrofauna are reduced by fire, <strong>in</strong> some <strong>in</strong>stances, prescribed<br />

burn<strong>in</strong>g, often <strong>in</strong> prairies and grassland, <strong>in</strong>creases arthropod density and<br />

biomass. Follow<strong>in</strong>g a prescribed burn <strong>in</strong> a grassland area (formerly a p<strong>in</strong>e-hardwood<br />

forest), populations of herbivores (phytophagous) <strong>in</strong>creased, presumably as a result<br />

of an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the food supply; at the same time, other groups such as predaceous<br />

spiders, flies, and scavengers showed less response to burn <strong>in</strong>g (Hurst 1970).<br />

There are at least three reports of grasshoppers be<strong>in</strong>g more numerous <strong>in</strong> burned<br />

than unburned areas. In the northern Rockies, Clayton (1975) found the orthopteran<br />

family Acrididae to be more numerous <strong>in</strong> burned than <strong>in</strong> unburned <strong>coniferous</strong> forests,<br />

and Hurst (1970) reports grasshoppers to have <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> numbers after prairie and<br />

grassland fires. In a northern M<strong>in</strong>nesota jack p<strong>in</strong>e burn, grasshoppers <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

after a fire, possibly due to recolonization from adjacent unburned forests or from<br />

survival <strong>in</strong> patches of unburned ground (Ah1 gren 1974). This recolonization from<br />

without or repopulation from with<strong>in</strong> burned areas could be a very significant behavioral<br />

mechanism regard<strong>in</strong>g the long-term effects of fire on forest floor macrofauna.<br />

There are some <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g evol utionary adaptations and imp1 ications among some<br />

groups of <strong>in</strong>sects surviv<strong>in</strong>g fires or <strong>in</strong>habit<strong>in</strong>g or recoloniz<strong>in</strong>g burned areas. In<br />

Montana, Clayton (1 975) coll ected grasshoppers from burned and unburned areas, ranked<br />

them from dark to light and determ<strong>in</strong>ed that out of 60 specimens, the 20 most darkest<br />

were from the burned area. Several <strong>in</strong>vestigators have reported melanistic forms of<br />

grasshoppers and other orthopterans, pentatomid bugs and noctuid larvae to <strong>in</strong>habit<br />

burned areas <strong>in</strong> African savannas (Reichert and Reeder 1972). Many species of rodents<br />

and birds <strong>in</strong> grassland fire environments have color patterns that harmonize with<br />

burned or partially burned yegetation. Such camouflage is useful to these species,<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce some predators seem a1 so to be adapted to fires, and will congregate at fires<br />

to feed on prey animals previously out of sight <strong>in</strong> the grass (Stoddqrd 1963; Komarak<br />

1969).<br />

RESEARCH ON IMPORTANT ARTHROPOD GROUPS<br />

Of the fprest floor macrofauna <strong>in</strong>fluenced by hqrvest<strong>in</strong>g residue and fire management<br />

practices, at least three orders of arthr~pods deserve special attention because<br />

of their feed<strong>in</strong>g behavior or their response to silvicultural or residue treatment.<br />

They are: Coleoptera (beetles), Hymenoptera (.ma<strong>in</strong>7y ants), and Arqneida (spiders).<br />

Col eoptera<br />

Of a11 the forest floor rnacrofauna, the beetles are probably the most abundant.<br />

Two to four families usually predom<strong>in</strong>ate. In a study of soil <strong>in</strong>vertebrates <strong>in</strong> two<br />

aspen forests <strong>in</strong> northern M<strong>in</strong>nesota, Wagner and others (-1 977 1 c ~ 1 ected l 22 famil ies<br />

of beetles <strong>in</strong> the soil 1 itter environment. The numerically dom<strong>in</strong>ant taxa were rove<br />

beetles (Sta hyl idnidae), ground beetles (~arabidqe) , cl ick beetles (Elateridae) ,<br />

and soldier g eetles (Cantharidae). In a recent study <strong>in</strong> Montana (Fell<strong>in</strong> 1980b),<br />

carabids apd staphyl <strong>in</strong>ids were the predom<strong>in</strong>ant fami 1 ies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!