06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Night radiation values for the clearcuts on both sites were more negative than<br />

they were on the uncut sites. This <strong>in</strong>dicated a greater loss of energy from the<br />

clearcut surface, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cooler potential temperatures. The canopy of an uqcut<br />

stand acts as a blanket hold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> energy. McCaughey (1978) determ<strong>in</strong>ed that net<br />

radiation was reduced 10% by clearcutt<strong>in</strong>g, as compared to the daily total above the<br />

<strong>coniferous</strong> canopy. The net effects of cutt<strong>in</strong>g differ above the canopy and at the<br />

soi 1 surface.<br />

Methods of seedbed preparation <strong>in</strong>clude leav<strong>in</strong>g residues on site or remov<strong>in</strong>g<br />

various amounts of them, and burn<strong>in</strong>g and mulch<strong>in</strong>g. Theoretically, each of these<br />

a1 ternatives should have a different effect on net radiation vqlues. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

analysis of our data <strong>in</strong>dicates that on unburned surfaces where residues were left,<br />

net radiation was greater than where residue was removed. Net radiation is signifi-<br />

cantly higher over dense residue surfaces than over burned surfaces. Treatment areas<br />

with residues burned had higher net radiation values than unburned areas where residues<br />

were removed or chipped or where m<strong>in</strong>eral soil was left exposed. Net radiation over<br />

areas where vegetation had grown back, however, was the same, whether previously<br />

burned or cleared. Data from our Wyom<strong>in</strong>g site (fig. 5). show that flux density of net<br />

radiation was much higher on cleared and burned areas than <strong>in</strong> places scarified, or<br />

where residues were chipped and spread over the surface.<br />

Figure 5.-- Net radiation over severaZ surfaces <strong>in</strong> a dearcut at the<br />

Wyom<strong>in</strong>g site, ae noon on JuZy 22, 1979. fie differences between<br />

burned and cleared and bekween scarified and chip spread probably<br />

are not sign< f$cant.<br />

Thermal characteristics of surface materials and soil <strong>in</strong>fluence the distribution<br />

of the energy. The materials comnonly encountered at our sites, along with their<br />

thermal properties, are listed <strong>in</strong> table 3. Our data allowed us to calculate approx-<br />

imate energy fluxes, to get an <strong>in</strong>dication of the overall energy balance. We used<br />

Campbell 's (1 977) equations to calculate sensible heat flux, and subtraction to<br />

estimate evaporative flux (fig. 6) for data on one day <strong>in</strong> a clearcut at Coram.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!