06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SILVICULTURE TREATMENTS<br />

Si 1 vicul tural treatments produced the most differences <strong>in</strong> soi 1 moisture levels ,<br />

as illustrated <strong>in</strong> figure 9. Differences were generally most apparent at the end of<br />

the grow<strong>in</strong>g season. Clearcuts reta<strong>in</strong>ed the highest percentage of moisture and the<br />

uncu t-ma ture stands the 1 owes t percentage. Soi 1 moi s ture level s i n s he1 terwood and<br />

group-selection treatments ranged between these two extremes. For the 3-year period,<br />

the cl earcu t , group-sel ection , and shel terwood treatments averaged 14, 8, and 5<br />

percent more soil moisture than <strong>in</strong> the mature forest at the end of the grow<strong>in</strong>g season<br />

<strong>in</strong> the lower elevation replicate and 9, 11, and 2 percent more, respectively, <strong>in</strong> the<br />

upper replicate. More precipitation was received <strong>in</strong> the upper replicate, which<br />

decreased soi 1 moisture deficits .<br />

Snowmel t recharged the soils under all treatments to about their same respective<br />

1 eve1 s each year, wi th he exception of the spr<strong>in</strong>g of 1977. This year, the uncutcontrol<br />

areas failed to reach full recharge by roughly 1.7 <strong>in</strong>ches (4.3 cm) of water.<br />

Soil moisture levels <strong>in</strong> the fa1 1 of 1976 were about normal , but a below average<br />

snowpack that w<strong>in</strong>ter fa led to produce enough water to overcome the fa1 1 deficit <strong>in</strong><br />

the uncut controls (fig 9). . The harvested areas came <strong>in</strong>to w<strong>in</strong>ter with less of a<br />

deficit than the contro 1 s ; the snowpack, even though below normal , was adequate to<br />

recharge those profiles. For example, at the end of the 1976 grow<strong>in</strong>g season, soi 1s<br />

under the uncut-control stands needed 5.4 <strong>in</strong>ches (13.7 cm) to reach recharge while<br />

those <strong>in</strong> the shel terwood and clearcut needed 4.1 and 2.6 <strong>in</strong>ches (10.4 and 6.6 cm) ,<br />

respectively. Another contribut<strong>in</strong>g factor discussed earl ier was i ncreased snow<br />

accumulation <strong>in</strong> the clearcuts, group selections , and shel terwoods i n re1 ation to the<br />

mature forest--a result of redistribution.<br />

RESIDUES TREATMENTS<br />

No consistent trends or differences <strong>in</strong> soil water status, could be attributed<br />

solely to the various residue treatments.<br />

Water Use<br />

The uncut mature larchlfir forest with<strong>in</strong> the study area used about 75 percent of<br />

the 24-i nch (61-cm) average annual on-si te precipitation. Water use wi th<strong>in</strong> the<br />

treatments was nearly always less than that of the uncut forest but varied substan-<br />

tially by treatment and year, A detailed summary of water use by silvicul tural and<br />

residue treatment for 3 years of the study are presented <strong>in</strong> appendix E.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!