06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of the commercial forest land <strong>in</strong> the region. In addition, the stand occurs on one of<br />

the more productive Douglas-fir habitat types (Pseudotsuga menziesid/Vacc~n~m<br />

caespihoswnl, and represents an operat<strong>in</strong>g situation and management opportunity <strong>in</strong><br />

which <strong>in</strong>tensive utilization is likely to occur first. The mixed size and age classes<br />

provide an opportunity for a range of silvicultural and utilization options.<br />

Major management objectives for timbered 1 ands represented by the site <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

--reduc<strong>in</strong>g probability of catastrophic <strong>in</strong>sect and disease<br />

damage;<br />

--achiev<strong>in</strong>g acceptable stand regeneration and development<br />

and reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g species diversity;<br />

--<strong>in</strong> parti a1 cuts, improv<strong>in</strong>q the residual stand through<br />

selective th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

--protect<strong>in</strong>g esthetic, recreation, and wildlife values;<br />

--avoid<strong>in</strong>g adverse biological impacts on the forest<br />

ecosystem.<br />

Harvest<strong>in</strong>g treatments to be tested were developed to <strong>in</strong>clude comb<strong>in</strong>ations of<br />

si lvicul tural practices, utilization level s, and post-harvest site treatments that<br />

could be considered management alternatives. Silvicultural prescriptions applied<br />

to harvest units <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

(1) Selection cutt<strong>in</strong>g--harvest<strong>in</strong>g approximately half of the<br />

rnerchantabl e volume, 1 eav<strong>in</strong>g a designated overstory o f<br />

small saw timber and pole stems. Dense sapl<strong>in</strong>g and pole<br />

stands were selectively th<strong>in</strong>ned. The treatment repre-<br />

sents current common practice <strong>in</strong> such stands.<br />

(2) Understory removal --removal of approximately half of the<br />

merchantable volume (and up to 213 of total cubic<br />

volume), leav<strong>in</strong>g a designated overstory of the better<br />

sawtimber and large pole stems.<br />

(3) Overstory removal --removal of a1 1 sawtimber trees and<br />

th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g pole stands, leav<strong>in</strong>g the seedl<strong>in</strong>g-sapl<strong>in</strong>g-<br />

small pole stems as a residual stand.<br />

(4) Clearcutt<strong>in</strong>g--harvest<strong>in</strong>g a1 1 trees designated as rner-<br />

chantable under the specified utilization standard.<br />

All other trees on the unit were slashed and treated<br />

as prescri bed.<br />

Four cutt<strong>in</strong>g units total<strong>in</strong>g approximately 60 acres (24 ha) were harvested, one under<br />

each of the described silvicultural prescriptions (fig. 4). Three o f the units--<br />

those designated for clearcut, overstory removal, and understary removal--were further<br />

sub-divided <strong>in</strong>to three treatment areas for application of vary<strong>in</strong>g utilization and site<br />

treatment practices. Uti 1 ization standards tested <strong>in</strong>cluded conventional saw1 og<br />

uti 1 ization and near-compl ete fiber uti 1 ization (table 2) ; post-harvest treatments<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded broadcast burn<strong>in</strong>g (fig. 5) and leav<strong>in</strong>g residues scattered on the site.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!