06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

As has already been stated, the forest land manager must be able to predict the<br />

outcomes of those alternative harvest treatments he wishes to consider. This means<br />

that he needs to know what the status of particular environmental characteristics<br />

will be over time after treatment. Figure 5 might represent such a characteristic<br />

vs. time relationship.<br />

TREATMENT TIME<br />

Figure 5. -- ~ nvirmenta2 characteristic versus time.<br />

It would be ideal if we could factorially apply a broad array of treatments to<br />

a variety of forest types and habitats and monitor forest development through rotation<br />

to obta<strong>in</strong> a direct measure of vegetative response, This obviously is impossible.<br />

Therefore, it seems necessary that we monitor more fundamental environmental charac-<br />

teristics over short time periods and attempt to correlate these characteristics<br />

with vegetative change to obta<strong>in</strong> a basis for prediction. The major problem we see<br />

for researchers and staff specialists do<strong>in</strong>g this concerns <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g primary environ-<br />

mental characteristics <strong>in</strong>to a holistic model to predict not only vegetative succes-<br />

sion, but also other environmental consequences follow<strong>in</strong>g treatment.<br />

Most readers are fami 1 iar with model s for predict<strong>in</strong>g vegetative succession and<br />

stand development. Modell<strong>in</strong>g efforts have been ongo<strong>in</strong>g for several years now, and<br />

have resulted <strong>in</strong> such products as Stage's (1 973) Stand Development Prognosis Model<br />

and the Grassland Simulation Model (Innis 1978). One purpose of such models is to<br />

meet the objectives we are concerned with here--that is, prediction of the state of<br />

the environment (or at least of certa<strong>in</strong> parts of the environment) at various po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

<strong>in</strong> time. We will not attempt to make an exhaustive review or criticism of such<br />

models here. Instead, we wish to discuss the general issue of environmental response<br />

prediction, and the <strong>in</strong>tegration and extrapolation of basic environmental <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />

toward that end.<br />

We are not prepared to suggest how the many environmental characteristics can<br />

be comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a determ<strong>in</strong>istic model to predict their status over time on a specific<br />

site, nor are we conv<strong>in</strong>ced this is even practicable. Nevertheless, we can suggest<br />

some ways for cop<strong>in</strong>g with environmental <strong>in</strong>teractions and estimat<strong>in</strong>g relatively<br />

short-term changes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!