06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S treamf 1 ow<br />

A &foot H-flume was <strong>in</strong>stalled immediately below the study area to provide general<br />

streamflow pattern and basel<strong>in</strong>e hydrograph data for Abbott Bas<strong>in</strong> on Coram Experimental<br />

Forest. The flume began operat<strong>in</strong>g at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the 1975 water year (October 1,<br />

1974). This co<strong>in</strong>cides with the completion of most of the treatments ; thus no preharves t<br />

streamflow data was generated. The nature of the watershed did not permit differentia-<br />

tion of treatment effects, so effects, if detectable, would reflect only, a composite<br />

of all treatments. Streamflow hydrograph data (appendix A) and general watershed<br />

parameters (appendix B) are presented as general reference material . These hydrographs<br />

are similar to some other northwestern Montana hydrographs (Montana DNR 1978).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

These results i 11 us trate how si 1 vi cul ture and residues treatments di fferenti a1 ly<br />

affect precipitation, soil water content, and amount and periodicity of water used<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the grow<strong>in</strong>g season. Additional axillary relationships are also presented.<br />

Precipitation<br />

Annual precipitation on the immediate study site averaged about 5 percent below<br />

normal dur<strong>in</strong>g the period of study compared to the 30-year average annual precipitation<br />

of 25.3 <strong>in</strong>ches (64.3 cm) (USDA, SCS 1977). Precipitation averaged 24 <strong>in</strong>ches (61.0 cm)<br />

(for both calendar year and water year), but varied annually between 29 <strong>in</strong>ches (73.7<br />

cm) dur<strong>in</strong>g 1976, and 23 <strong>in</strong>ches (58.4 cm) dur<strong>in</strong>g 1977 (water year October 1 to September<br />

30). About 50 percent of the total precipitation came <strong>in</strong> the form of snow.<br />

SILVICULTURE TREATMENTS<br />

Harvest<strong>in</strong>g under the three silviculture treatments differentially reduced the<br />

density of the overwood, and consequently i ncreased the amount of preci pi tation<br />

that reached the forest floor. However, these differences were also a function<br />

of storm size (<strong>in</strong>tensity and duration) and elevation.<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong><br />

Precipitation reach<strong>in</strong>g the forest floor was greatest on clearcuts and group<br />

selections, <strong>in</strong>termediate on shel terwoods , and least <strong>in</strong> the uncut mature forest<br />

(table 1). This, however, was directly related to ra<strong>in</strong>fall per 24-hour period.<br />

As shown <strong>in</strong> table 1 and appendices C and D, storms that produced only 0.1 <strong>in</strong>ch<br />

(0.25 cm) <strong>in</strong> the clearcut open<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> a 24-hour period, resulted <strong>in</strong> only about one-<br />

third of it reach<strong>in</strong>g the forest floor <strong>in</strong> the uncut mature forest and about three-<br />

fourths <strong>in</strong> the shel terwood. However, if the storm exceeded 0.5 i nch ( 1.27 cm) ,<br />

two-thirds or more reached the forest floor <strong>in</strong> the mature forest and nearly 90 percent<br />

reached the floor <strong>in</strong> the shel terwoods. As <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> table 1 and appendix D, the<br />

amount of <strong>in</strong>terception "losses" was directly related to the stand<strong>in</strong>g tree vol urne.<br />

The prediction equations (precipitation <strong>in</strong> 0 .Ol-i nch i0.03-cm] <strong>in</strong>crements) describ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

this relationship are:<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong> reach<strong>in</strong>g forest floor<br />

per 24-hour period <strong>in</strong> mature forest<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong> reach<strong>in</strong>g forest floor<br />

per 24-hour period <strong>in</strong> shel terwood<br />

= -0.03826 + 0.75019 (ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> clearcut)<br />

= -0.01709 + 0.91103 (ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> clearcut)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!