06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The recovery rate of shrub volume from year two to four was also most favorable on<br />

the understory-protected treatment; volumes <strong>in</strong>creased from 35 percent of preharvest<br />

volume at 2 years to 62 percent at 4 years (fig. 6). Shrub volume recovery rates were<br />

roughly comparable on the other three treatments, rang<strong>in</strong>g from 12 to 16 percent between<br />

year two and four.<br />

Twenty-three shrub species were found on the study area but six of these species<br />

accounted for well over 90 percent of the total preharvest shrub volume. These six<br />

were mounta<strong>in</strong> map1 e (~cer gZabrwn) , n<strong>in</strong>ebark (~h~socarpus malvaceus) , thimbleberry<br />

(&bus pxrvif Zoms ) , rose (~osa gymnocarpa) , a1 der nu nus s<strong>in</strong>uata) , and servi ceberry<br />

(~meZamhier a~nifoZia) . Their relative importance <strong>in</strong> terms of volume was a function<br />

of treatment and number of years s<strong>in</strong>ce harvest. The examples shown <strong>in</strong> figure 7 illustrate<br />

the relative stability of some species and the responsiveness of others follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

treatment. N<strong>in</strong>ebark, for example, reta<strong>in</strong>ed the same relative amount of volume <strong>in</strong> both<br />

treatments shown, whereas serviceberry changed 1 i ttle on the unders tory-protected<br />

treatment and changed a lot on the <strong>in</strong>termediate-utilization-and-burned treatment;<br />

mounta<strong>in</strong> maple's re1 ati ve amount of vol ume changed substantially on both treatments<br />

(fig. 7).<br />

YEAR<br />

YEAR<br />

Figure 7.--Relative response, as measured by volume, of the major shrub species to<br />

two residues management treatments: (A) Understory-protected treatment, (BI Inder-<br />

mediate-utiZization-and-burned treatment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!