06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In the spruce-fir stands <strong>in</strong>fested with the eastern spruce budworm <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Maritime Prov<strong>in</strong>ces, fire is also <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the successional relationships. In<br />

the absence of fire the budworm kill s primarily shade-tolerant trees, and these<br />

species tend to regenerate. If fires occur often with<strong>in</strong> the regeneration period,<br />

the shade-<strong>in</strong>tolerant species regenerate <strong>in</strong>stead, and these species are less preferred<br />

hosts of the eastern spruce budworm (Fl ieger 1970). Essentially, then, <strong>in</strong> eastern<br />

Canada, <strong>in</strong> the Lake States, and <strong>in</strong> other areas where the spruce budworm occurs,<br />

outbreaks may have been less prevalent <strong>in</strong> primeval times because fire may have<br />

curtailed the expansion of shade-to1 eranl cl imax species.<br />

In the West, the fi re-residue-<strong>in</strong>sect-successional <strong>in</strong>teraction a1 so <strong>in</strong>fl uences<br />

outbreaks of the Douglas-fir tussock moth. Forest managers and <strong>in</strong>vestigators have<br />

been concerned that fire exclusion <strong>in</strong> some <strong>coniferous</strong> forests may have <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

the susceptibility to the Douglas-fir tussock moth by a1 low<strong>in</strong>g the number of true<br />

fir understory components to <strong>in</strong>crease (Kickert and others 1976). In study<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

last two tussock moth outbreaks <strong>in</strong> Oregon and Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, Williams (1978) found<br />

<strong>in</strong>festations most common <strong>in</strong> stands, where fire was excluded. There, fir stands<br />

developed under the p<strong>in</strong>e and eventually dom<strong>in</strong>ated the site--a site ord<strong>in</strong>arily too<br />

dry for either Douglas-fir or true firs. Recently, research has begun to see if<br />

fire could, <strong>in</strong> fact, be used to reduce Douglas-fir tussock moth damage by prevent<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rowth of susceptible Douglas-fir and true firs on sites more suitable to p<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Mart<strong>in</strong> and others 1972).<br />

7<br />

Fire, understory, and residue created by beetle attacks are also <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />

the successional <strong>in</strong>teractions of the western p<strong>in</strong>e beet1 e and ponderosa p<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Weaver (1943) believed that fires, <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with p<strong>in</strong>e beetle attacks, frequently<br />

controlled the density, age classes, and composition of ponderosa p<strong>in</strong>e stands. He<br />

also seems to have answered a question asked by land managers: "Would fire exclusion<br />

<strong>in</strong> ponderosa p<strong>in</strong>e stands yield denser stands and more host material for bark beetles?"<br />

(Kickert and others 1976). Weaver (1951, 1955) <strong>in</strong>dicated that as a result of fire<br />

excl usion, more <strong>in</strong>tolerant white fir, <strong>in</strong>cense cedar, Li bocedrus decurrens Torr. , and<br />

western 1 arch <strong>in</strong>crease and develop <strong>in</strong>to densely reproduc<strong>in</strong>g stands that compete<br />

with the overstory p<strong>in</strong>es for moisture, thus predispos<strong>in</strong>g the overstory p<strong>in</strong>es to<br />

bark beetle attacks.<br />

In other situations, wildfires <strong>in</strong> forest residues created by beetle-killed<br />

p<strong>in</strong>e have killed reproduction, chang<strong>in</strong>g the p<strong>in</strong>e habitat to an aspen type, The<br />

p<strong>in</strong>es eventually return, along with fir and spruce; the p<strong>in</strong>es eventually are killed<br />

by the western p<strong>in</strong>e beetle, leav<strong>in</strong>g only the fir and spruce (Craighead 1925).<br />

Another <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g fi re-forest residue-successional <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong>volves<br />

<strong>in</strong>sects caus<strong>in</strong>g deterioration <strong>in</strong> fire-killed trees <strong>in</strong> the Pacific Northwest.<br />

Excessively dry or wet fire-killed trees do not attract <strong>in</strong>sects. In a normally dry<br />

forest, recurr<strong>in</strong>g fires keep down regeneration, a1 low<strong>in</strong>g f i re-kil 1 ed trees to<br />

become too dry. In normally wet coastal forests, fire-kil led trees protected by the<br />

cover of a green forest are too wet for the deterioratian caus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sects; however,<br />

if recurr<strong>in</strong>g fires destroy the cover, the dead trees will dry out enough to bec~rne<br />

attacked (Kirnney and Furniss 1943).<br />

In a longleaf and slash p<strong>in</strong>e, P<strong>in</strong>us caribwa Morelet, forest <strong>in</strong> the southeqst,<br />

the only known epidemics of engrave-&- spp., occurred <strong>in</strong> a stand that<br />

had not been burned annually for over 70 years. Transpiration by mixed hardwoods<br />

that <strong>in</strong> other areas had been removed by prescribed burn<strong>in</strong>g a parently weakened the<br />

p<strong>in</strong>e, predispos<strong>in</strong>g them to attacks by the engraver beetles ( I? omarek 1970).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!