06.04.2013 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES in rocky mountain coniferous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Control Chapped Picked up Broadcast Piled and Piled and<br />

and and Burned Burned Burned<br />

Spread Removed (~n rows) (between row)<br />

LOGGING RESIDUE DISPOSAL TREATMENTS<br />

Figwe 3.--Organic matter content of the surface Z-<strong>in</strong>ches of soil associated with<br />

- various residue treatments on lo&epo2e p<strong>in</strong>e cZearcuts.<br />

P H<br />

The effects of the residue tfeatments on the pH of the surface 2-<strong>in</strong>ches of<br />

soil are shown <strong>in</strong> figure 4. The only signi ficant chanae was the <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>in</strong> pH associated with burn<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>drowed residues. ~hese w<strong>in</strong>drowed residues<br />

burned hotter than the broadcast residues. The <strong>in</strong>creased pH is attributed to the<br />

release and concentration of both monovalent and divalent cations and nitrates<br />

as the residues are oxidized by fire. These <strong>in</strong>creases have persisted throughout<br />

the 4-years s<strong>in</strong>ce the w<strong>in</strong>drows were burned.<br />

VEGETATIVE COVER DENSITY<br />

Effects on Vegetative Characteristics<br />

The effects of logg<strong>in</strong>g and residue treatments on the density of vegetation<br />

cover<strong>in</strong>g the ground are shown <strong>in</strong> figure 5. Prior to logg<strong>in</strong>g, total cover density<br />

at the ground surface (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g plants, litter, and logg<strong>in</strong>g residue) was similar<br />

to that on the unlogged control tracts--about 99 percent. Because the density of<br />

vegetative cover on the logged units was already nearly complete, even the<br />

addition of large quantities of residue had little effect on total cover density<br />

measurements, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g them, on the average, less than 1 -percent. Follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

logg<strong>in</strong>g, the cover densities of those blocks where residue was chipped and<br />

respread were still about 100-percent, although the cover was ma<strong>in</strong>ly chips rather<br />

than plants and litter. This cover of chips was still <strong>in</strong>tact <strong>in</strong> 1977, 4-years<br />

after spread<strong>in</strong>g.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!