08.04.2013 Views

Part I: Seals teeth and whales ears - Scott Polar Research Institute ...

Part I: Seals teeth and whales ears - Scott Polar Research Institute ...

Part I: Seals teeth and whales ears - Scott Polar Research Institute ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In 1963 sub-let its lease to the international Fishery Company (IFC). This consortium<br />

of three Japanese whaling companies applied to the FIG for a sealing licence, which<br />

was granted after Albion Star had agreed to train Japanese sealers. (The government<br />

needed to be satisfied that the Japanese would have the necessary expertise <strong>and</strong><br />

equipment to kill <strong>and</strong> process up to 6,000 bull elephant seals as permitted under the<br />

regulations).<br />

Sealing was now undertaken using experienced crew <strong>and</strong> ships from Albion Star<br />

– Bogen on Albatros, Nilsen on Dias <strong>and</strong> Hauge on Petrel. (I had sailed with Hauge<br />

<strong>and</strong> Bogen in 1951). The Japanese filled twelve positions on board: in the engine<br />

room <strong>and</strong> galley <strong>and</strong> all the shore workers with the exception of the gunner. Each<br />

ship had five Norwegians, including the chief engineer, mate <strong>and</strong> boatman, plus a<br />

government sealing inspector. The arrangement s worked very well, despite<br />

language problems <strong>and</strong> the Japanese adapted to the shore work, using long-h<strong>and</strong>led<br />

knives for flensing the blubber. The Japanese were late arriving at Grytviken for the<br />

1963 season <strong>and</strong> sealing didn’t begin until September 1963. The sealing season lasted<br />

only five weeks, 3.998 seals were taken <strong>and</strong> yielded 7,156 barrels of oil. In 1964, both<br />

IFC <strong>and</strong> Nippon Suisan Kaisha (NSK) applied for sealing licences <strong>and</strong> 5,147 seals<br />

were taken. NSK had an experimental licence to kill up to 100 bulls in February 1964<br />

to familiarise their crews with sealing methods. This yielded 2.01 barrels per seal, the<br />

highest ever recorded for autumn sealing, but in spring 1964 only IFC had a licence.<br />

In the final three seasons of sealing the mean age of the catch had stabilised at about<br />

7.7 y<strong>ears</strong>, just above my target for sustained yield. Government licensed sealing at<br />

South Georgia ended in 1964 after 54 y<strong>ears</strong> with the stock in an optimal state<br />

condition; better than had been achieved in any other elephant seal population.<br />

Some 260,860 elephant seals had been taken yielding 476,742 barrels of oil or 1.83<br />

barrels per seal. Over the whole period of government licensed whaling <strong>and</strong> sealing<br />

at South Georgia, 1910 – 1965 seal oil represented 16.3% of total oil production - not<br />

inconsiderable; its probably came close to meeting the running costs of Grytviken<br />

whaling station. The five species of <strong>whales</strong> caught totalled 54,473, yielding 2,769,456<br />

barrels of oil plus other products, including 202,105 [long] tons of guano, frozen<br />

meat, meat meal <strong>and</strong> salted liver as well as 475 tons of baleeen.<br />

Conclusion.<br />

<strong>Seals</strong> are now protected under the 1975 Falkl<strong>and</strong> Isl<strong>and</strong>s Dependencies<br />

Conservation ordinance [<strong>and</strong> under the 1982 Convention on the Conservation of<br />

Antarctic Marine Living Resources].<br />

Although these methods fifty y<strong>ears</strong> ago may have been crude compared to today,<br />

the management research I had accomplished was way ahead of its time. This was<br />

primarily due to the fact that I had developed an accurate, precise (to within months)<br />

method for estimating the age of a mammal, which allowed me to construct agespecific<br />

models of growth <strong>and</strong> of biomass. What had gone before in research on seal<br />

biology was very broad <strong>and</strong> gross. Unreliable estimates of age were based on crude<br />

parameters, broad age classes – based on rough biometrics analyses, skull suture<br />

closure, <strong>and</strong> a lot of guesswork. For the first time it was now possible to monitor age<br />

changes in the commercial catch, as had been possible with fish for many y<strong>ears</strong>. It<br />

427

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!