15.06.2013 Views

Socio-cultural Processes and Livelihood Patterns at Tirurangadi - CDS

Socio-cultural Processes and Livelihood Patterns at Tirurangadi - CDS

Socio-cultural Processes and Livelihood Patterns at Tirurangadi - CDS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The British army was led by Col.Hartley. Martab Khan was routed <strong>and</strong> Husain Ali khan,<br />

cut off from joining Martab Khan was forced to retre<strong>at</strong> to the <strong>Tirurangadi</strong> Fort. The<br />

British army surrounded the fort <strong>and</strong> Husain Ali Khan surrendered with 900 of his men<br />

(Logan, 1951; 469-70). This was one of the crucial b<strong>at</strong>tles th<strong>at</strong> sealed the Mysorean’s f<strong>at</strong>e<br />

in Malabar, <strong>and</strong> facilit<strong>at</strong>ed the transfer of the area to the British, which took place in<br />

1792. The equally interesting fe<strong>at</strong>ure is th<strong>at</strong> despite the defe<strong>at</strong> on the first occasion, the<br />

Mysoreans did not surrender the fort or shift to another ‘safer’ place.<br />

Another interesting fe<strong>at</strong>ure of this episode is the particip<strong>at</strong>ion of the Mappilas. The<br />

British account does not mention who mobilized them to support Mysore <strong>and</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> was<br />

the role th<strong>at</strong> they played in the b<strong>at</strong>tle with Hartley. While the rebellions by Hydros Kutty<br />

Mooppan <strong>and</strong> Athan Gurukkal, were more in the character of individual actions, the<br />

mobiliz<strong>at</strong>ion of Mappilas <strong>at</strong> <strong>Tirurangadi</strong> was the first collective action against the British,<br />

though in support of Mysore. No Mappila is mentioned as particip<strong>at</strong>ing in the b<strong>at</strong>tle<br />

between Makhdum Ali <strong>and</strong> Humberstone. Was it th<strong>at</strong> the Mappilas, or whoever led them,<br />

were aware of the prospect of a British conquest if Mysore lost the b<strong>at</strong>tle? Or was it a<br />

simple expression of religious solidarity, or <strong>at</strong> best, a story cooked up by the British to<br />

demonstr<strong>at</strong>e the existence of such solidarity? The l<strong>at</strong>ter position seems to be difficult to<br />

accept as the Mappilas do not show any consistency in demonstr<strong>at</strong>ing such solidarity in<br />

all the b<strong>at</strong>tles between British <strong>and</strong> Mysore forces in Malabar. The more likely answer is<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the particip<strong>at</strong>ion of the Mappilas was a local phenomenon more rel<strong>at</strong>ed to the defense<br />

of the fort. Their source of inspir<strong>at</strong>ion is a point th<strong>at</strong> requires further investig<strong>at</strong>ion. But<br />

the b<strong>at</strong>tle appears to signify on the one h<strong>and</strong>, the downfall of Mysore, <strong>and</strong> on the other,<br />

the emergence of Mappilas as a collectivity.<br />

The British rule

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!