15.06.2013 Views

Socio-cultural Processes and Livelihood Patterns at Tirurangadi - CDS

Socio-cultural Processes and Livelihood Patterns at Tirurangadi - CDS

Socio-cultural Processes and Livelihood Patterns at Tirurangadi - CDS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The British army was led by Col.Hartley. Martab Khan was routed <strong>and</strong> Husain Ali khan,<br />

cut off from joining Martab Khan was forced to retre<strong>at</strong> to the <strong>Tirurangadi</strong> Fort. The<br />

British army surrounded the fort <strong>and</strong> Husain Ali Khan surrendered with 900 of his men<br />

(Logan, 1951; 469-70). This was one of the crucial b<strong>at</strong>tles th<strong>at</strong> sealed the Mysorean’s f<strong>at</strong>e<br />

in Malabar, <strong>and</strong> facilit<strong>at</strong>ed the transfer of the area to the British, which took place in<br />

1792. The equally interesting fe<strong>at</strong>ure is th<strong>at</strong> despite the defe<strong>at</strong> on the first occasion, the<br />

Mysoreans did not surrender the fort or shift to another ‘safer’ place.<br />

Another interesting fe<strong>at</strong>ure of this episode is the particip<strong>at</strong>ion of the Mappilas. The<br />

British account does not mention who mobilized them to support Mysore <strong>and</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> was<br />

the role th<strong>at</strong> they played in the b<strong>at</strong>tle with Hartley. While the rebellions by Hydros Kutty<br />

Mooppan <strong>and</strong> Athan Gurukkal, were more in the character of individual actions, the<br />

mobiliz<strong>at</strong>ion of Mappilas <strong>at</strong> <strong>Tirurangadi</strong> was the first collective action against the British,<br />

though in support of Mysore. No Mappila is mentioned as particip<strong>at</strong>ing in the b<strong>at</strong>tle<br />

between Makhdum Ali <strong>and</strong> Humberstone. Was it th<strong>at</strong> the Mappilas, or whoever led them,<br />

were aware of the prospect of a British conquest if Mysore lost the b<strong>at</strong>tle? Or was it a<br />

simple expression of religious solidarity, or <strong>at</strong> best, a story cooked up by the British to<br />

demonstr<strong>at</strong>e the existence of such solidarity? The l<strong>at</strong>ter position seems to be difficult to<br />

accept as the Mappilas do not show any consistency in demonstr<strong>at</strong>ing such solidarity in<br />

all the b<strong>at</strong>tles between British <strong>and</strong> Mysore forces in Malabar. The more likely answer is<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the particip<strong>at</strong>ion of the Mappilas was a local phenomenon more rel<strong>at</strong>ed to the defense<br />

of the fort. Their source of inspir<strong>at</strong>ion is a point th<strong>at</strong> requires further investig<strong>at</strong>ion. But<br />

the b<strong>at</strong>tle appears to signify on the one h<strong>and</strong>, the downfall of Mysore, <strong>and</strong> on the other,<br />

the emergence of Mappilas as a collectivity.<br />

The British rule

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!