15.06.2013 Views

Socio-cultural Processes and Livelihood Patterns at Tirurangadi - CDS

Socio-cultural Processes and Livelihood Patterns at Tirurangadi - CDS

Socio-cultural Processes and Livelihood Patterns at Tirurangadi - CDS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in Venniyur. There were also a few m<strong>at</strong>ch companies, such as Malabar “tiger’ m<strong>at</strong>ches in<br />

<strong>Tirurangadi</strong>.<br />

<strong>Tirurangadi</strong> since 1956<br />

The above account has brought us to the form<strong>at</strong>ion of Kerala st<strong>at</strong>e. It remains for us to<br />

give an account of the changes th<strong>at</strong> have taken place since 1956, before undertaking an<br />

analysis of the contemporary issues. L<strong>and</strong> reforms in Kerala, initi<strong>at</strong>ed by the first<br />

Communist Ministry in Kerala <strong>and</strong> completed during the seventies, brought about<br />

sweeping changes in the social rel<strong>at</strong>ions. It was probably the single most important factor<br />

in the transform<strong>at</strong>ion of the region as well as the problems th<strong>at</strong> it is facing today. During<br />

the period of l<strong>and</strong> reforms, the power of all the l<strong>and</strong>lords disappeared. Nambutiri Illams<br />

like, Thekkiniy<strong>at</strong>h Keerang<strong>at</strong> <strong>and</strong> Muthed<strong>at</strong>h shifted to Thrissur, <strong>and</strong> other Illams like<br />

Chiramangal<strong>at</strong>h, Thotuva Muthed<strong>at</strong>h, Attayur, Edamar<strong>at</strong>h <strong>and</strong> Mangalassery remained in<br />

the region, although they lost practically everything during l<strong>and</strong> reform. Devaswama also<br />

lost their l<strong>and</strong>s. It is clear th<strong>at</strong> those households dependent on the paddy fields suffered<br />

the most. The nayar households, who had considerable paramba l<strong>and</strong>s also, suffered<br />

through partition of their property. There were cases of households who divided<br />

themselves into forty different segments, <strong>and</strong> thus reduced to small holders. Large<br />

l<strong>and</strong>lords like Puzhankadav<strong>at</strong>h, Attukal<strong>at</strong>hil, Arang<strong>at</strong> kurup, have been reduced to small<br />

holders, <strong>and</strong> only the large taravad of Mang<strong>at</strong> Mussad remains, without occupants.<br />

Neduvancheri Mussad, another earlier l<strong>and</strong>lord, is now a newspaper agent <strong>and</strong> Attayur<br />

Nambutiri is a retired schoolmaster. So is Edamana nambutiri, who is also involved in the<br />

management of the school (CBHS).Puzhikkal family in Nannambra is now partitioned,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the main branch now owns only a few acres of paramba l<strong>and</strong>. Mulavanuli Illam in<br />

Nannambra has disappeared although the paramba in the name remains. Thottassiiri<br />

Panikkars have been reduced to owners of a small paramba, managed by a woman, <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!