15.06.2013 Views

Socio-cultural Processes and Livelihood Patterns at Tirurangadi - CDS

Socio-cultural Processes and Livelihood Patterns at Tirurangadi - CDS

Socio-cultural Processes and Livelihood Patterns at Tirurangadi - CDS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kapr<strong>at</strong> family has left the place, <strong>and</strong> the large tharavad house remains. Similarly the<br />

tharavad house of Kulavoor Chempazhi nayars, another large l<strong>and</strong>lord family can be<br />

seen, but they are reduced to minor l<strong>and</strong>holders.<br />

There are a few remains of l<strong>and</strong>lord culture also. The kalarithara of K<strong>at</strong>hiniiri, rel<strong>at</strong>ed to<br />

Thottassiiri Panikkar can be seen, but the kalari is not used. K<strong>at</strong>tuvachira temple, where<br />

Thottassiri held their Urayma, is now run by a popular committee. Ullanam <strong>and</strong> Pappanur<br />

Devaswams, run by l<strong>and</strong>lord families such as Chiramagalam Mana <strong>and</strong> Velimutt<strong>at</strong>h<br />

Mussad, also are run by Committees. Many of the festivals run by l<strong>and</strong>lord families are<br />

no longer conducted, although there have been <strong>at</strong>tempts to revive them recently. The<br />

families of artisans, brought <strong>and</strong> settled by the l<strong>and</strong>lord families, are now without<br />

employment, or are forced to subsist on other means.<br />

L<strong>and</strong> reforms did affect the major Muslim families also. Kizhakkiniyak<strong>at</strong>h Nahas, the<br />

largest l<strong>and</strong>lord family of the area, have lost almost all their paddy fields in the process of<br />

l<strong>and</strong> reform, <strong>and</strong> so were families like Achamp<strong>at</strong>tu, melevittil, Puthiya nalak<strong>at</strong>h, Naduvil<br />

puthiyak<strong>at</strong>h, Eramakkak<strong>at</strong>h <strong>and</strong> so on. However, majority of the Muslims had paramba<br />

l<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> different members of the same family had their holdings registered as<br />

individual property, <strong>and</strong> hence, as family collectives did not lose as much as the<br />

Nambutiris <strong>and</strong> Nayars. It should be remembered th<strong>at</strong> the Muslim personal law permitted<br />

women to retain their individual property, <strong>and</strong> in the settlements of 1905 <strong>and</strong> 1935, a<br />

large number of women, belonging to the large l<strong>and</strong>lord families were holding property.<br />

This system allowed a large number of Muslim households to retain a substantial share of<br />

the l<strong>and</strong>s, provided the individual segments did not cross the l<strong>and</strong> ceiling regul<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />

At the same time a substantially large number of l<strong>and</strong> transactions were taking place. A<br />

casual examin<strong>at</strong>ion of the owners of parambas bearing the names of identifiable<br />

l<strong>and</strong>holding families showed th<strong>at</strong> they were transferred several times before coming to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!