25.10.2012 Views

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE LINGUISTICS STUDENT’S HANDBOOK 156<br />

language would have a single meaning for every form, and a single form for<br />

every meaning.<br />

Panini’s Principle<br />

Panini’s Principle or the Panini Principle are other names given to the<br />

Elsewhere Condition.<br />

Principle of least effort<br />

The principle of least effort is based on work by Zipf, who states the principle<br />

in its most general form as: ‘[A] person will strive to minimize the probable<br />

average rate of his work-expenditure (over time)’ (Zipf 1949: 1; italics in original).<br />

This has been interpreted in a number of ways in the study of language<br />

(see for example, discussion of Zipf ’s Law, below). It is often held to imply that<br />

speakers will simplify their pronunciation as much as possible, for example<br />

through assimilation and the loss of consonants and vowels. However, speakers<br />

are also listeners, and need to minimise the effort that it will take to understand<br />

the spoken language as well as the effort it will take to produce it; these<br />

two opposing forces need to be considered in understanding the principle.<br />

Projection Principle<br />

Chomsky (1981: 29) formulates this principle as follows: ‘Representations at<br />

each syntactic level (i.e. LF, DS and SS) are projected from the lexicon, in that<br />

they observe the subcategorization properties of lexical items.’<br />

Repeated Morph Constraint<br />

The Repeated Morph Constraint is also known as the Multiple Application<br />

Constraint. Lieber (1981: 173) phrases this as: ‘No word formation process . . .<br />

can apply iteratively to its own output.’ In other words, no word can contain a<br />

sequence of identical affixes. There are known exceptions, but they tend to be<br />

marginal.<br />

Right-hand Head Rule<br />

Williams (1981: 248) states the Right hand Head Rule as ‘In morphology, we<br />

define the head of a morphologically <strong>com</strong>plex word to be the righthand<br />

member of that word.’ There are languages for which this does not seem to be<br />

true across the board, and the statement has given rise to a large amount of discussion,<br />

but has been extremely influential.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!