25.10.2012 Views

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE LINGUISTICS STUDENT’S HANDBOOK 88<br />

phenomenon, even when it would be useful to the reader. Even with the best<br />

descriptive grammars, therefore, the reader often has to work quite hard to find<br />

an answer to any specific question, and with brief descriptions it is frequently<br />

impossible. That is why multiple descriptions and journal articles focusing on<br />

particular structures or functions in a given language are often a useful support<br />

for a grammar of that language.<br />

Possible benefits of this type of data include:<br />

• They provide the most efficient way to gain data on a range of languages<br />

which the investigator does not speak; the alternative of eliciting<br />

information from native speakers is frequently not available.<br />

• They allow access to a wide range of languages.<br />

Possible disadvantages of this type of data include:<br />

• A descriptive grammar may presuppose familiarity with the writing<br />

system of the language concerned.<br />

• A descriptive grammar may presuppose some familiarity with the language<br />

concerned, or may require access to a dictionary.<br />

• The data may be patchy or insufficient for the investigator’s purposes.<br />

• Different models of description and terminologies may make individual<br />

grammars difficult to interpret or to <strong>com</strong>pare with descriptions of<br />

other languages. In the phonetics/phonology sections of such grammars,<br />

different theoretical presuppositions may provide in<strong>com</strong>patible<br />

analyses of even fundamental material.<br />

Introspection<br />

Introspection is probably one of the most useful and one of the most condemned<br />

ways of collecting data in linguistics. In phonetics, introspection about<br />

what one’s articulators are doing in a particular utterance is usually encouraged.<br />

In syntax, introspection about marginal syntactic constructions is often<br />

vilified. Introspection about matters of discourse is probably even more<br />

difficult. In either case, it should be pointed out, experience makes for better<br />

introspection. But it is probably always safer to verify the results of introspection<br />

in some independent way if at all possible.<br />

Possible benefits of this type of data include:<br />

• It makes it possible to consider very rare constructions.<br />

• It is an efficient mode of data collection.<br />

• It provides an efficient way of examining alternatives.<br />

• It provides a good way to start an investigation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!