25.10.2012 Views

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE LINGUISTICS STUDENT’S HANDBOOK 66<br />

symbol or a category’, that is, that a feature such as Case can have a value such<br />

as [accusative]. Similar extensions of feature theory are found in A-Morphous<br />

Morphology, for example. Binarity, to judge by the way that it is currently used<br />

by linguists in features, is all very well, but it is certainly not universal.<br />

Tree structure<br />

In the meantime, tree structure has been moving in precisely the opposite<br />

direction, away from multiply branching trees towards binary-branching.<br />

Scalise (1984) introduces what he terms the Binary Branching Hypothesis with<br />

respect to morphological trees, and argues that such a restriction can be<br />

justified in that domain.<br />

In syntax, a restriction to binary branching can be seen as being implicit in<br />

X-bar theory (though Chomsky 1970, probably the location of the introduction<br />

of X-bar into Chomskyan linguistics, does not use binary-branching<br />

trees). It was generally adopted following Kayne (1984). Although Kayne<br />

introduces the notion of binary branching for technical reasons, it seems to<br />

have been wel<strong>com</strong>ed as a principled constraint on the format of trees. Binary<br />

branching appears to fail in the case of coordination but only there (see also<br />

Wells 1957 [1947]). We might wonder, however, how principled the limitation<br />

is if it fails at all.<br />

Interestingly, a restriction to binarily branching trees has been resisted in<br />

phonology. Not only have widely supported suggestions that the syllable might<br />

have a binarily branching structure like that in (3) been fiercely debated, but<br />

arguments for structuring consonant sequences (such as those that arise in both<br />

the onset and the coda of strengths) seem remarkably weak in models which look<br />

for constituent structure, with the result that a ‘flat’ tree like that in (4) might<br />

be preferred. (Dependency Phonology uses sonority as a guide to headedness,<br />

and is able to assign heads to these clusters; but the arguments for some of them<br />

Syllable<br />

Onset Rhyme<br />

Peak Coda<br />

b e<br />

Syllable<br />

t<br />

s t r e ŋ � s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!