25.10.2012 Views

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE LINGUISTICS STUDENT’S HANDBOOK 70<br />

which has more than one branching structure in it. In (4), A dominates D, but<br />

immediately dominates C. Mothers immediately dominate their daughters.<br />

As well as showing dominance relationships, trees like those in (3) and (4) also<br />

(4)<br />

A<br />

B C<br />

indicate linear precedence. In (4), for example, B <strong>com</strong>es before (to the left of)<br />

D. Although we might be able to envisage a tree in which the branch linking C<br />

to D was lengthened, and B occurred between D and E, it is generally taken<br />

that this would not be a legal tree structure: it would involve crossed branches,<br />

and crossed branches are not permitted.<br />

Although trees show both dominance and precedence relationships, the two<br />

are usually treated together as a single set of relationships. Occasionally, rules<br />

for dominance are distinguished from rules for precedence in an ID/LP<br />

(Immediate Dominance / Linear Precedence) format (Gazdar et al. 1985).<br />

Standard phrase-structure rules (rules of the general form A → b + c) cannot<br />

distinguish between these two aspects of the tree structure, with the result that<br />

it would be impossible to write a standard phrase-structure rule to generate<br />

trees with crossing branches.<br />

Some conventions<br />

D E<br />

Conventionally, syntactic trees are drawn as being binary branching (i.e. no<br />

mother can have more than two daughters) except in instances of coordination.<br />

This is a recent convention, and not necessarily adhered to by all syntacticians.<br />

(For more discussion see section 11.) Binary-branching trees are generally<br />

accepted in morphology, but are not always accepted in phonology, where the<br />

arguments for assigning a binary structure to a sequence of three (or more)<br />

adjacent consonants in a word like sixths may not always be clear. However, even<br />

here, some scholars enforce binary-branching trees, and nearly all scholars<br />

prefer them.<br />

Another convention, again generally accepted in syntax, but not always in<br />

phonology, is sometimes referred to as the Single Mother Convention. The<br />

Single Mother Convention states that every node except the root must have one<br />

and only one mother. This is important for establishing the mathematical<br />

structure of the tree, and seems relatively uncontroversial in syntax and morphology.<br />

In phonology, however, there has been a great deal of discussion of<br />

ambisyllabicity, whereby the medial consonant in a word like silly may be seen<br />

as being simultaneously the coda of the first syllable and the onset of the second<br />

syllable. This accounts for two things: /i/ cannot occur in a stressed syllable in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!