25.10.2012 Views

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE LINGUISTICS STUDENT’S HANDBOOK 224<br />

cent or more. Thus these figures should be taken as no more than a guide to<br />

whether a language is likely to be extremely stable or very threatened.<br />

Writing system<br />

Very often the writing system used for a particular language is more a matter<br />

of the colonial power than anything linguistic, and in many cases writing<br />

systems change either from country to country or as the colonial powers change<br />

or for religious reasons. A blank here often means that the language is not<br />

written a great deal at all, but may well be a matter of the information not<br />

having been readily available.<br />

Stress<br />

In many languages, particularly in tone languages, stress is not a relevant<br />

concept, and often this section is correspondingly left blank for that reason.<br />

Where stress falls in a relatively regular position in the word, this is noted.<br />

Where the position of stress is known to be dependent on vowel length or syllable<br />

weight this is also noted. In such cases it is not usually stated whether<br />

stress falls on a heavy/long syllable near the beginning or near the end of the<br />

word.<br />

Rare consonants<br />

Consonants which were included as rare types were retroflex, uvular and pharyngeal<br />

consonants and clicks, ejectives and implosives. Any consonant type<br />

not having an IPA symbol was noted. No distinction is made between a language<br />

which has a single retroflex consonant (for example) and one which has<br />

a whole series of retroflex consonants.<br />

Number of vowels<br />

The number of vowels a language has is, of course, a matter of analysis rather<br />

than something which is an automatic given. Where there were five vowel<br />

qualities but ten contrastive vowel elements because the second five were<br />

distinguished by length or nasalisation, this is noted as ‘5 + length’ or ‘5 +<br />

nasalisation’ rather than as ‘10’. Where the long or nasalised vowels are not<br />

as numerous as the basic vowel qualities, the number is provided in parentheses.<br />

Diphthongs are noted separately. It should be noted that it is frequently<br />

difficult to tell from descriptions whether a diphthong or a vowel<br />

sequence is intended, and usually the terminology of the source has been<br />

respected.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!