25.10.2012 Views

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

201 CITATION ETIQUETTE<br />

(8) Chomsky (1965: 3) calls these ‘formatives’.<br />

(9) Chomsky (1965) provides a statement of what later became known as<br />

the ‘standard’ theory of syntax.<br />

In some instances, particularly in referring to reference works or works which<br />

have appeared in several editions (e.g. translated into several languages), it may<br />

make more sense to refer to a section or paragraph number rather than a page<br />

number. The symbol ‘§’ can be used to mean ‘section’. It is not always<br />

absolutely clear when you should give a page or section number and when you<br />

should not: individual authors or editors may prefer more or fewer page<br />

numbers. For beginners, it is re<strong>com</strong>mended that a page number should be given<br />

whenever there is a reference to a specific passage, and omitted only in the<br />

general cases illustrated by (9), where the reference is to the whole book.<br />

How do I refer?<br />

In general, the name–date–page method of reference illustrated in (8) and (9)<br />

is used in linguistics, and will be assumed here. However, if you are using some<br />

other system of referencing, you should make sure that you give information<br />

equivalent to that which is available in the name–date–page system. You will<br />

certainly need to be able to read other referencing systems if you read works<br />

from before the middle of the last century.<br />

Where do I put the reference?<br />

Most <strong>com</strong>monly, it will be obvious that the date and page should <strong>com</strong>e immediately<br />

after the name of the author, so that in (1) we will say ‘Chomsky (1957:<br />

32) believes that this is because …’ and so on. The problem be<strong>com</strong>es more<br />

acute when the name of the author is not part of your sentence. For example,<br />

references for a sentence like (5) might be inserted immediately after the word<br />

scholars or at the end of the sentence. Thus we might get ‘Many scholars (e.g.<br />

Smith 1935; Brown 1950; Jones 1986) believe that …’ or we might get ‘Many<br />

scholars believe that the morpheme is a physical reality (see e.g. Smith 1935;<br />

Brown 1950; Jones 1986)’. In such lists, authors may be listed in chronological<br />

order (as here) or in alphabetical order – be consistent! Even harder is the case<br />

where we mention the name of the author, and then provide a direct citation.<br />

For example, ‘Lyons in his book published in 1968 makes on page 425 the<br />

<strong>com</strong>ment that ‘“reference” necessarily carries with it the presupposition of<br />

“existence”.’ The rule is to formulate this so as to give the reference just once<br />

and all in the same place. An obvious way of doing this is to say ‘Lyons (1968:<br />

425) <strong>com</strong>ments that “ ‘reference’ necessarily carries with it the presupposition<br />

of ‘existence’”.’ An alternative might be to say that ‘It must be recalled that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!