25.10.2012 Views

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE LINGUISTICS STUDENT’S HANDBOOK 78<br />

is this status in any way correlated with literacy in cultures where literacy is a<br />

relevant consideration?<br />

Are all people who speak only one language ipso facto native speakers of that<br />

language? This be<strong>com</strong>es relevant in countries where, for example, English was<br />

once a colonial language and has been adopted for local use. Some people feel<br />

un<strong>com</strong>fortable with the idea that a person who speaks only Indian, Nigerian or<br />

Singaporean English can be a ‘native speaker of English’. This is probably tied<br />

up with rather extravagant ideals about what ‘English’ is, but it be<strong>com</strong>es a real<br />

political problem in some places, especially when native-speaker status may be<br />

used as a tool of discrimination.<br />

Is there a test which will prove that a person is a native speaker<br />

of a particular language?<br />

The simple answer to the question in the title of this section is ‘No’. A more<br />

<strong>com</strong>plex answer might mention that if any such test is in theory possible, it has<br />

not yet been devised or shown to be accurate in any sense at all. This, of course,<br />

raises the further question of whether ‘native speaker’ is a term which has a<br />

precise definition at all. And this in turn raises the question of whether native<br />

speakers of a particular language are a definite category of people or whether<br />

the notion of native speaker is a prototype, a presupposed perfect model,<br />

which real speakers may resemble more or less closely.<br />

What does a native speaker do?<br />

Native speakers are generally assumed to have reliable intuitions about what is<br />

or is not part of their own language, and to be able to make judgements about<br />

the structures of their language: for example, they can state reliably whether<br />

something is ambiguous, and which parts of the utterance belong together. As<br />

a result of this, they are able to guide linguists in determining the grammar of<br />

their language, even though they themselves do not have conscious access to<br />

their grammar of their own language.<br />

The whole notion of intuition is taken up in a separate section (see section<br />

15). But there is plenty of evidence that intuition is variable, both within the<br />

same speaker and between speakers, at least in the subtler cases. At the level at<br />

which intuitions are probably the most constant, the level at which we judge<br />

that Syntax not my functioning is is not a legitimate sentence of English (even<br />

though it is an occurrent one: I have heard someone say this), we probably do<br />

not need native speakers to bring us the news.<br />

We also need to recall that one of the things we have learnt from late<br />

twentieth-century linguistics is that production is variable. While some of this<br />

may be accessible to introspection, it seems unlikely that all of it is. That is,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!