25.10.2012 Views

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

Laurie Bauer - WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE LINGUISTICS STUDENT’S HANDBOOK 40<br />

when the precise value is not important, but matching of values is. With binary<br />

features, the � stands in place of a�or a -, so that we can get rules like (12);<br />

where features have a wider range of potential values, the alpha-notation can<br />

cover those as well, as in (13).<br />

(12) [� nasal] → [� back] / ___ [� back]<br />

(13) [� nasal] → [� place] / ___ [� place]<br />

The important point in (12) and (13) is that the � must have the same value<br />

everywhere it occurs on any given application of the rule. So (12) means that<br />

the nasal is further specified as [� back] before something which is [� back]<br />

and as [– back] before something which is [– back]. Similarly (13) means that<br />

whatever value for [place] the following segment has (e.g. labial, coronal,<br />

dorsal, etc.), the nasal will take the same value.<br />

Refinements<br />

Only the basics of rule notation have been dealt with here, and there are a<br />

number of conventions for writing and interpreting rules which are not mentioned<br />

here. For example, alpha-notation can be used for marking disagreement<br />

as well as agreement, and can be<strong>com</strong>e more <strong>com</strong>plex than was illustrated<br />

in (12) and (13). Such <strong>com</strong>plexities have not been mentioned partly because<br />

they may not be required (at some particular level of study, in a particular<br />

model), partly because, being more <strong>com</strong>plicated than those facets which have<br />

been mentioned here, they require more assumptions about the form of the<br />

grammar. Many phonology textbooks will provide more elaborate discussions<br />

of rule writing and rule interpretation.<br />

References<br />

Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York:<br />

Harper & Row.<br />

Jensen, John T. (1990). Morphology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.<br />

Lieber, Rochelle (1992). Deconstructing Morphology. Chicago and London: University<br />

of Chicago Press.<br />

Wartburg, Walther von (1967). Évolution et structure de la langue française. 8th edn.<br />

Berne: Francke.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!