27.12.2013 Views

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER ONE<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

On any given Sunday in Great Britain, over 49,000 men<br />

and women'. preach God's Word to congregations with<br />

memberships totalling over 6.9 million persons. 2 These<br />

preaching events possess common features, but the<br />

differences among them remain vast.<br />

St. Andrews, the city in which I work, might be a<br />

typical community. A new student in town could taste the<br />

sermonic offerings in a wide variety of settings.<br />

Denominational affiliation, congregational size, and<br />

building architecture would vary among the Holy Trinity<br />

parish church, the Baptist Church, St. James Roman Catholic<br />

Church, the Gospel Hall, and others.<br />

But, even if, by some miracle of ecumenical<br />

cooperation, denominational labels could be dropped for a<br />

week, and all local pastors preached sermons in the same<br />

building to an equal mix of people from all religious<br />

backgrounds, there would still be an enormous difference<br />

between the Reverends MacGregor, Donaldson, Taylor, and<br />

McLeod. Some of the contrasts one could attribute to the<br />

accidents of nature: age, size, shape, and voice tone.<br />

But behind each of these incidental details lie real<br />

differences in preaching theology and practice. Many<br />

factors contribute to these differences. One such factor,<br />

the homiletic training preachers receive in college or<br />

university, forms the central focus of this study. Another

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!