27.12.2013 Views

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

155<br />

entire theological education and relate it to the church<br />

and world they are preparing to serve.<br />

II. 'Objective'/'Subjective' Groupings of Theologies<br />

All academic preparation for preaching shares the<br />

task of discussing the same questions. As chapters two<br />

and three document, the seven theologians (and those who<br />

follow in their traditions) would offer diverse answers<br />

even to the most basic questions.<br />

Besides variation in the answers, we find an equal<br />

divergence in the certainty with which specific answers<br />

are given. Some preaching theologies focus on timeless<br />

answers to the questions, while others emphasize the need<br />

to continually ask the questions, seeking ever new<br />

answers appropriate for the contemporary human situation.<br />

This latter divergence--the matter of the objectivity (or<br />

permanence) of man's knowledge of truth--influences the<br />

teaching of preaching just as does the obvious matter of<br />

the different answers given to the basic theological<br />

questions.<br />

Let us examine this issue further. Chapter three<br />

presented six theological spectrums. The first two of<br />

these deal with questions relating to God. (What did God<br />

do for man, or for himself, at the cross? In what ways<br />

has God revealed himself in Scripture?) The second two<br />

deal primarily with questions relating to man. (What is<br />

the primary need man faces? What must man do, or<br />

receive, in order to have his need met?) The third pair

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!