27.12.2013 Views

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

174<br />

teaching format. The offered theology may grasp the<br />

student and engender faith. Even if that does not occur,<br />

answers learned in theological college may assist the<br />

student in subsequent years; when faith struggles arise,<br />

the learned answers, already in mind, may stimulate<br />

faith.<br />

VI. Hypotheses Relating to the Seven<br />

Individual Theologies<br />

We turn once again to a consideration of theological<br />

features distinct to the seven theologians and how each<br />

of these features might affect the teaching of preaching<br />

in colleges where that theology predominates.<br />

In contrast to the chapter which follows, we deal<br />

here with entirely hypothetical situations. No college<br />

exists where the theology and practice of any theologian<br />

exclusively controls the teaching of preaching.<br />

Yet it proves helpful to continue our comparison of<br />

the seven theologians on this point. If the theology and<br />

practice of any one of them did control the teaching of<br />

preaching at a college, what effect might it have on<br />

teaching content and methodology?<br />

We hypothesize these teaching settings based on key<br />

features within the seven theologies of preaching.<br />

Section VII of the last chapter listed specific strengths<br />

and weaknesses of each theological system. We will now<br />

consider how these strengths and weaknesses pass over<br />

into the teaching of preaching. In each case,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!