27.12.2013 Views

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

221<br />

d. "Speaking which teaches and<br />

encourages, rather than convinces."<br />

The following preaching definitions, which<br />

Individual 'Rahner lecturers' propose, support this<br />

hypothesis. (Underlining is mine.)<br />

"Use of the spoken word to challenge, encourage,<br />

console, and strengthen those who are of the household of<br />

faith."<br />

"That liturgical act by which the Holy Spirit is<br />

handed on for an anamnesis (remembrancel of Christ's<br />

saving deeds."<br />

Similarly, note this 'Rahner' prediction for<br />

preaching to come: "More emphasis placed on faith<br />

sharing—deeper understandin g of one's culture and<br />

people's needs--less time spent on maintaining of<br />

preacher as person who 'speaks at' people."<br />

B. Pairs of Theolo g ical Subgroups<br />

Based on the 'objective'/'subjective' factor, one<br />

would expect the existence of two distinct pairs of<br />

composite responses to most survey questions. The<br />

opinions of lecturers identifying with Lloyd-Jones and<br />

Stewart ('objective' theologians) would appear on one<br />

side, while those who selected Tillich and Rahner<br />

('subjective') would join in a position which contrasts<br />

with the other two. On a number of survey data lines<br />

(from tables 26-39), this expected pairing does occur.<br />

Much more surprising, however, is the fact that a large<br />

number of the remaining data lines evidence other

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!